When I take a
potato masher out of the kitchen drawer, my dog hardly pays attention.
But when
I reach in and take out the cheese grater, she suddenly becomes my best
friend.
After I started in this business in the mid-80's, an experienced loan
agent
pulled me aside and said, "When I look at a loan file or talk to a
borrower, I know in less than a minute whether or not it is a 'do-able'
deal." Experienced agents have told me that this is no longer the case,
given the automatic underwriting procedures, the changed guidelines,
the
compliance issues, etc. As you can guess, a small percentage of
experienced
agents have moved back into "private money", "make sense"
lending, since this is where their comfort level is.
There appear to be three big components
at play with volumes for lenders: rates, equity, and underwriting. Rate-wise
we're above the lows, but still very good. I hear few folks complaining
about
rates, but they certainly have not helped spur business in recent
weeks. For
equity, unless property values stabilize, and/or move higher, many
folks who
had equity in their property already refinanced; those that didn't refi
because
of values haven't seen enough of a rise to do so now. And is anyone
loosening
up their guidelines or their documentation? It would be news to me... One
agent wrote to me and said, “Basically there is a reason someone didn't
refi
last year, and those that didn't probably can't do it now.” So
we're left
with a purchase business. Fannie & Freddie and large investors feel
this
year's market will be about 50-60% of last year's, and companies are
already
seeing it. Established companies are adding agents, branches, and
perhaps
moving into new areas. Others are cutting loose agents, consolidating
branches,
and in some cases retrenching. What an interesting business.
What are experienced mortgage companies
doing right now to help themselves? Name a solid company that hasn’t established
clear rate lock policies and controls managed by a centralized lock
desk. What
good does it do anyone to have old, expired loans in your pipeline? And
have
good measurement devices: a complete set of management reports to
measure
profitability, risks, the cost to originate a loan, calculate your gain
on sale
margin by product, commissions, old loans and/or loans closed and not
shipped
or purchased after a set period of time. You’ve heard it all before,
right?
Lots of
mortgage companies made large profits last year – some would say that
it
balanced out the money lost in 2008. But do they expect to make more
money in
2010 on lower volumes? Management shouldn’t assume that a decline
in
profitability is the result of decreased origination volume – what if
volume
drops 10% but profits are down 25%? Gain on sale margins may have
slipped for
whatever reason – overtime, a few bad loans, pricing decisions to
maintain
market share, etc. And watch those utility bills: I was walking by a
mortgage
co-worker's desk the other day, and noticed that she had plugged her
power
strip back into itself to save electricity! That’s sacrifice! (Yes –
blonde.)
At least
rates are cooperating, and last week long-term interest rates declined.
Mortgage
rates have retreated to the low 5.00% range, and our economy is still
“fragile”.
Inflation is not an issue and the consumer spending still is relatively
slow.
Maybe everyone is waiting for 3D televisions!
The MBAA reported that mortgage
application volumes increased 9.1% last week from the week before. Refinancing
filings rose almost 11%, and purchase apps were up a little over 4%.
Nationwide
refi’s make up almost 72% of apps.
The press has certainly focused on FHA lending lately, and many feel
with good
reason. FHA-insured mortgages are thought to be a problem in the
future.
Government officials, who only five years ago were clamoring for more
lenient
guidelines to increase home ownership percentages, now want to further
tighten
guidelines. The FHA allowed builder and seller-funded down-payment
assistance
programs longer than other loan types, which didn’t help their
situation or
their capital reserve ratio, nor did institutional investors
refinancing “at
risk” mortgages into FHA loans. According to a story in the Wall Street
Journal, the FHA says the loans it is guaranteeing these days will turn
a
profit because the credit profile of its borrowers has improved. The
average
credit score for FHA borrowers has risen to 681, from 630 two years
ago. The
median U.S. score is about 720. Of course, those in the business know
that
investors have FHA overlays which have contributed toward the
improvement.
And in fact the FHA announced changes
to its guidelines yesterday. It will raise the minimum down payment
required for
borrowers with credit rating scores below 580 to 10%, while the down
payment for
higher-ranked borrowers would stay at 3.5%. The up-front MI premium is
also
going from 1.75% to 2.25%. HUD is seeking congressional approval to
allow it to
raise annual mortgage insurance premiums -- which are paid out by the
borrower
over the life of the loan -- above the 0.55 percent maximum. Lastly,
the FHA
also said it was cutting the amount of aid sellers could provide buyers
to 3
percent of the purchase price from 6 percent; a move it said could help
lessen
incentives to inflate appraised home values.
Of course the
press, and economists, will question whether or not it will cut off the
housing
recovery. If you think about it, in the long run is raising the down
payment
requirement, or the minimum credit score, the cost of MI, or cutting
seller
contributions going to kill the housing market? The FHA, after all,
doesn't
lend money to home buyers. It collects fees to insure lenders against
default on
loans that meet FHA criteria. Of course, with the current criteria,
everyone in
the business knows that their nickname, deserved or not, is now the
"new
subprime" loan: average credit scores of FHA borrowers is lower than
other
types of loans, delinquencies are much higher, and the market share of
FHA
loans is between 25-50% in many parts of the US.
In an interesting quote, Warren Buffett weighed in on the plan
to tax
banks. "I don't understand plans for a bank tax - it just doesn't make
any
sense to me that banks should be taxed
to cover losses at other bailed-out companies, such as automakers,
Fannie Mae ,
or Freddie Mac.”
Getting back
to the market, yesterday was pretty quiet, giving lenders and lock
desks a day
after the holiday to work on projects, extensions, renegotiations, etc.
Dealers
reported that mortgage selling was pretty light, with just under $1
billion in
supply, and the Fed, money managers, and hedge funds doing the buying.
But today
we have had a flurry of news. U.S. Housing Starts unexpectedly fell
4% in
December, pulled down by a lack of activity for single-family
dwellings. Starts
for single-family homes fell 6.9 percent last month, but multifamily
starts
were up over 12%. The Producer Price Index was up for the third
month in a
row, rising .2% (up 4.4% for the year) versus expectations of being
unchanged. The core rate, ex-food & energy, was unchanged, lower
than
expected.
But perhaps
more important than the economic news were the earning results this
morning. Morgan
Stanley earned $413 million in the 4th quarter, but it
was still
below estimates. Wells Fargo swung to a profit in the fourth quarter
on
net income of $2.82 billion, versus Bank of America’s loss of
$5.2
billion due to taking a hit from higher credit costs and TARP
repayments. And the
Bank of New York Mellon profit beat estimates, hitting almost $600
million.
Bank of
America’s stats included a 2009 net income of $6.3 billion, a one-time
$4
billion TARP repayment cost, provisions for credit losses of $10.1
billion, and
nonperforming assets of $35.7 billion. Morgan Stanley reported income
from
continuing operations for the year of $1.1 billion, compared to a loss
of about
$800 million a year before. They also incurred a repurchase of TARP
capital, net
revenues for the year of $23.4 billion compared with $18.2 billion in
the prior
year, total nonperforming assets of $27.6 billion as of December 31.
After all of this we find the 10-yr
yield at 3.65% and mortgage prices better by between .125 and .250.
Three rotten
old Grandmas were sitting on a bench outside a nursing home when a
Grandpa
walked by.
And one of the Grandmas yelled out saying, "We bet we can tell exactly
how
old you are."
The old man said, "There is no way you can guess it, you old fools."
One of the old Grandmas said, "Sure we can! Just drop your pants and
under
shorts and we can tell your exact age."
Embarrassed just a little, but anxious to prove they couldn't do it, he
dropped
his drawers. The Grandmas asked him to first turn around a couple of
times and
to jump up and down several times. Then they all piped up and said,
"You're 87 years old!"
Standing with his pants down around his ankles, the old gent asked,
"How
in the world did you guess?"
Slapping their knees and grinning from ear to ear, the three old ladies
happily
yelled in unison, "We were at your birthday party yesterday!"
Rob
(Check
out http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/channels/pipelinepress/default.aspx.
For archived commentaries, check www.robchrisman.com,
or to subscribe/unsubscibe write to rchrisman@robchrisman.com.)