In
last night’s speech President Obama asked for creation of
special unit of federal prosecutors to further investigate
mortgage lending practices that led to the housing crisis. "This
new unit will hold accountable those who broke the law, speed
assistance to homeowners, and help turn the page on an era of
recklessness that hurt so many Americans." Soon afterward I
received this note: “I guess former Senator Dodd, Barney Frank,
Bill Clinton, and Andrew Cuomo had better assemble good teams of
attorneys. I don’t remember who ran the FDIC for the last 8
years but Shelia Bair and Alan Greenspan might need one too!” Obviously the government’s
housing ownership push to artificial levels a decade ago is
well remembered.
Seriously,
there were two quotes
that caught the interest of those in our business. The
first was, ".....responsible homeowners shouldn't have to sit
and wait for the housing market to hit bottom to get some
relief. That's why I'm sending this Congress a plan that gives
every responsible homeowner the chance to save about $3,000 a
year on their mortgage, by refinancing at historically low
interest rates. No more red tape. No more runaround from the
banks. A small fee on the
largest financial institutions will ensure that it won't
add to the deficit, and will give banks that were rescued by
taxpayers a chance to repay a deficit of trust. Let's never
forget: millions of Americans who work hard and play by the
rules every day deserve a government and a financial system that
do the same." Obviously any type of grand refinance scheme hurts
the price of premium (above par) MBS’s.
Long
on rhetoric and short on details, as one would expect from any
SOTU speech, the best article so far is from the WSJ. The reporter speculates
the government will use FHA/FN/FH to refi loans they don't
already guarantee. But
what's the cost if the government isn't assuming some losses? And the mechanics of
entering the private mortgage market make one’s head spin. Any
new legislation is going to have a very tough time clearing
congress ahead of the election – I would put the odds near zero.
Here is the article: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203806504577181652800384514.html?modWSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories.
The
second quote was directly at money center commercial
banks. "I will not go back to the days when Wall Street
was allowed to play by its own set of rules. The new rules we
passed restore what should be any financial system's core
purpose: Getting funding to entrepreneurs with the best ideas,
and getting loans to responsible families who want to buy a
home, start a business, or send a kid to college. So if you're a
big bank or financial institution, you are no longer allowed to
make risky bets with your customers' deposits. You're required
to write out a "living will" that details exactly how you'll pay
the bills if you fail - because the rest of us aren't
bailing you out ever again. And if you're a mortgage
lender or a payday lender or a credit card company, the days of
signing people up for products they can't afford with confusing
forms and deceptive practices are over. Today, American
consumers finally have a watchdog in Richard Cordray with one
job: To look out for them. We will also establish a Financial
Crimes Unit of highly trained investigators to crack down on
large-scale fraud and protect people's investments. Some
financial firms violate major anti-fraud laws because there's no
real penalty for being a repeat offender…So pass legislation
that makes the penalties for fraud count.”
Honestly,
I
lose track of the MERS lawsuits around the country, at various
stages of appeal, with attorneys on both sides doing very well
for themselves. I did notice, however, that Mortgage
Electronic Registration Systems had a nice victory yesterday
as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Judicial Circuit
validated its rights to assign a security deed and/or foreclose
on secured property. The decision upheld the decision of the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in
Smith V. Saxon Mortgage. The plaintiff in the original case had
contested the foreclosure of her home on the grounds that: The
assignment of the security deed was invalid because MERS, as
nominee of a defunct lender could not assign the documents of
its own volition, and that the "splitting" of the mortgage and
the note rendered the mortgage null and void and therefore
notices of foreclosure were invalid as not coming from a secured
creditor. In the original District Court opinion in March 2011,
the judge pointed to the standard language in the Georgia
security deed signed by all borrowers at closing which grants
MERS the power to act on behalf of the current and future owners
of the loan. "Unless the instrument creating the power
specifically provides to the contrary . . . an assignee thereof
. . . may exercise any power therein contained," she wrote. "The
Security Deed…transfers rights to MERS, and MERS' assigns may
exercise any power contained therein."
Hey,
when was the last time a mortgage company went public?
Residential mortgage loan servicer Nationstar Mortgage
Holdings named Bank of America Merrill Lynch to underwrite
its initial public offering. Last May, the company, which is
backed by private equity firm Fortress Investment Group LLC,
filed with the SEC to raise up to $400 million in an IPO and use
the proceeds from the offering to service acquisitions and for
other general corporate purposes. But in other Fortress news,
Daniel Mudd (charged with securities fraud during his Fannie Mae
CEO reign) has resigned from the board of Fortress.
Flagstar
Bancorp
came out with its earnings, and saw its losses narrow to $45
million in the fourth quarter from $192 million a year earlier,
but worsen from the $14 million loss in the 3rd
quarter. Flagstar has
had 14 straight quarterly losses. On the mortgage side,
originations were up 11% to $10 billion from $9 billion in the
year-ago period, and originations for the entire year increased
to $27 billion from $26 billion in 2010. The company sold and
securitized $10.5 billion in loans during the quarter, up from
$8.6 billion in the year-ago period, but the gain-on-sale margin
fell sharply to 1.02% from 1.53%. Interest rate lock commitments
(IRLCs), the primary driver of GOS revenues, declined 14.5% to
$11.2 billion from $13.1 billion. Charge-offs were down ($19
million in bad residential loans down from $360 million in the
year-ago quarter). Net servicing revenue increased 71.3% from
the prior quarter to $29 million, but the company's reserve for
probable losses on representations and warranties rose to $69
million from $10 million a year ago.
The
value of servicing is indeed in a state of flux, but that
doesn't stop pools from being bought and sold. The latest
offering comes from MountainView
Servicing Group: a $129 million portfolio of Ginnie Mae
mortgage servicing rights containing 566 loans that are 99% FHA
fixed-rate mortgages. Approximately 50% of the portfolio is
retail origination and the other half is through third-party
brokers. The loans are 14 months seasoned and spread between
California (97%) and Illinois (3%). The weighted average
servicing fee is .396%. Bids are due next Tuesday - contact Troy
Rusniak at trusniak@mvcg.com for more
information.
Over the last month,
mortgage-backed security prices have done better than Treasury
prices, mostly because of supply (mortgage banker selling of
$1-2 billion per day) and demand (the Fed alone is buying $1.2
billion per day) issues. Could this relative price
movement change direction? Sure – some broker-dealers believe
that a sustained selloff in the rates market that will take the
10-year Treasury to 2.5% or above would be the most likely
scenario in which MBS spreads would widen significantly. This
is due to a number of factors, including a prediction that,
assuming a selloff is caused by improving fundamentals of the US
economy, the probability of Fed's QE 3 involving agency MBS
should diminish significantly in a rates backup scenario.
On top of that, IF rates were to see that big of a move, it
would mean that volatility has increased – rarely a good thing
for MBS’s. And when that happens, “convexity hedging” related
selling from servicers and originators would probably lead to a
sudden increase in the supply of agency MBS in this scenario,
resulting in even more selling. Lastly, domestic banks have been
providing a very strong bid for agency MBS over the past 5-6
months, and in a rates backup scenario, their deposit growth is
likely to be lower, meaning that banks would be unlikely to grow
their holdings until rates stabilize again. Simple!
Looking
at where things are now, yesterday rates barely budged (the
10-yr at 2.06%) and MBS prices flat – it is really quit out
there. The 2-yr note auction went just fine yesterday; today we
have $35 billion in 5-yr notes to auction off. Later today we’ll
have the FOMC's trifecta of its statement (12:30), economic
projections (2PM) and press conference (2:15). (There was one
news item this morning – the MBA’s weekly mortgage apps number
for last week dropped 5%. Refinance activity slipped 5.2%, and
purchase apps dropped 5.4% - refi percentage stands at about 81%
of all apps. The four-week moving average for all mortgage
applications is still up 4.1%.) Currently rates are still
nearly unchanged, with the 10-yr sitting around 2.05% and MBS
prices perhaps a shade better.
Yes,
last night was the State of the Union address, which is often
high gratuitous applause and low on substance. But politics is
definitely in the news, and here is a handy-dandy guide to
figuring out which candidates most closely fits your beliefs: http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/candidate-match-game?locinterstitialskip
If
you're interested, visit my twice-a-month blog at the STRATMOR
Group web site located at