Yesterday’s market had
more ups and downs than Fred
Thompson’s run for the presidency! And it looks like both the stock
market and rates are lower again today on recession fears, leading loan
agents
(those still in the business) to start “smilin’ and dialin’”
and calculating how many commission checks it will take to pay off
their home
equity lines. (“I promise I’m going to put more in the bank
this time around!”) Jumbo Intermediate ARM rates are down in the 4%
range
if the borrower wants to pay a point. The 10-yr is down to 3.30% this
morning,
and mortgage prices are starting off better by another .250 in price.
Yesterday’s Fed move
caused folks to think back on what
Fed Funds really are. Remember that “Fed Funds” is the rate that
banks can borrow money from each other to keep their reserve amounts in
line.
The “Discount Rate” is the interest rate at which an eligible
financial institution may borrow funds directly from the Federal
Reserve when
their reserves dip below the reserve requirement. The Discount Rate is
considered the last resort for banks, which usually borrow from each
other. The
Federal Reserve can change either, but they can’t change mortgage
rates. If
a borrower asks an agent why their mortgage lock doesn’t drop .75%,
there
are two answers. First, the loan is locked, and they have an
obligation to
the lender, just as if rates moved the other way. Second, moves in
overnight
rates aren’t directly linked to mortgage rates, and http://library.hsh.com/?row_id'
may be a help to you. Mortgage rates are dependent upon many more
complicated
factors than the Fed raising or lowering them. The supply of mortgages,
the
demand by investors for them, the value of the servicing, the credit
quality of
the borrower, etc. all factor into mortgage rate. Also check out http://biz.yahoo.com/cnbc/080122/22783168.html
Regarding yesterday’s
notes on the Bank of
America/Countrywide union, please note that much of the content should
be
attributed to Bob Hagerty, who writes for the Wall Street Journal!
Speaking of
the Wall Street Journal, there is an article today discussing the Fed’s
move. L. Meyer, a former Fed governor, believes that the FOMC wants to
increase
the pace of rate decreases, and stated that the Fed action "would be
pointless" if it only moved up its action by a week. Along those lines,
Lehman
Brothers forecasts, a little late for Aurora’s good, “…a 25
basis point rate cut as likely at the scheduled meeting next week,
followed by
another 75 basis points of easing through June (.25% each in March,
April and
June). This places the terminal Fed funds rate at 2.50%.”
What is the latest on
loan limits? There are
two bills (HR 1427, the House version, and S 2036, the Senate version)
that
would raise the conforming loan limit among other things, both
supported by
Bernanke and Paulson. H.R. 1427 passed in May 2007. (!) The bill would
increase
the conforming loan limit in high-cost areas to the minimum of either
150% of
the national limit (to $625,500) or the median price in the same area.
The
higher limits do not apply to loans held as assets by the GSEs, only to
mortgages packaged into MBS and sold by the GSEs. S. 2036 was
introduced in the
Senate in September 2007 but has not yet been subject to a vote. (!)
The
proposed increase in loan limits would be the same as in H.R. 1427.
This bill
would raise the loan limit for all conventional single-family
mortgages, not
just those serving as collateral in MBS. Importantly, the increase
would be for
only one year following enactment.
Interestingly, California accounted for 49% of the dollar volume of
securitized
jumbo mortgages and
only 14% of
agency (Fannie/Freddie) mortgages. The same study found that
92% of
the affected mortgages would be California
loans. So increasing the loan limits would lead to a higher
concentration of California
loans in
agency pools, which may or may not be desirable from an investor’s
viewpoint. Also, with the additional potential supply of FNMA/FHLMC
securities,
some wonder if that will actually move their prices down and rates up,
relative
to other mortgages!
A young ventriloquist is
touring the clubs and one night
he's doing a show in a small town in Arkansas.
With his dummy on his
knee, he starts going through his
usual dumb blond jokes when a brunette woman in the 4th row
stands
on her chair and starts shouting, “I've heard enough of your stupid
blond
jokes. What makes you think you can stereotype women that way? What
does the
color of a person's hair have to do with her worth as a human being?
Its guys
like you who keep women like me from being respected at work and in the
community and from reaching our full potential as a person. Because of
you and
your kind, people continue to perpetuate discrimination against not
only
blonds, but women in general...and all in the name of humor!"
The embarrassed
ventriloquist begins to apologize, and the
gal, who is a brunette, yells, "You stay out of this mister! I'm
talking
to that little jerk on your lap."
Rob