Oct. 4, 2011: Focus on appraisals, appraiser hurdles, and AMC's; and oh, Bank of America details mortgage exit strategy
Rob Chrisman
"As
previously announced, Bank of America Home Loans plans to exit
the correspondent mortgage lending channel and focus entirely on
retail distribution for its mortgage products and services. After a comprehensive
review of market opportunities, Bank of America will close its
Correspondent Lending channel by the end of 2011,
following an orderly transition with Clients. Effective
immediately, no new Negotiated Trade pool or flow trades will be
offered. Best Efforts and Mandatory locks will be accepted
through close of business Monday, October 31. (All locks during
this time frame must be 45 days or less in duration. Existing
extension, relock, renegotiation, and trade extension/rolls
policies will apply, but commitments will not be allowed to
extend beyond December 15.) AOT’s and Direct trades will be
offered through close of business Monday, October 31. Impacted
Clients will receive a separate communication shortly with key
dates. Loans must be purchased by Correspondent Lending on or
before December 15. Existing locks extending beyond December 15
as of October 3 will be honored. Bank of America will work
closely with Correspondent Lending Clients to ensure an orderly
transition for customers with mortgage loans in the pipeline.
All loans currently in the pipeline will receive full support
and continue through the process. Bank of America Warehouse
Lending is operating business as usual while Bank of America
evaluates opportunities for that line of business." Straight
from the horse's mouth, 'nuff said.
In talking & writing with loan agents, I continue to appraisal issues.
Some comments are constructive, others not. For example, here is
someone trying to help solve the confusion on the coding used in
appraisals: "I am surprised by the number of appraisers who
don’t understand (or maybe it’s the software companies) the true meaning of some
of the terms. Since the beginning of September the number
of appraisers who have taken what FNMA means differently is
amazing. Probably 3 out of 4 appraisals have the C – Contract
date and S – Settlement dates incorrect. Most appraisers take
the C to mean Closed Date and the S to mean listing status,
thereby having the dates reversed as FNMA specifically states C
is CONTRACT DATE and S is SETTLEMENT Date. I have actually had
to send them the pages directly from FNMA guidelines to get them
to change the dates - just thought I would mention this coming
from an operations/underwriting point of view. Here's the
reference, and a quick look at pages 22-24 might help: https://www.efanniemae.com/sf/lqi/umdp/pdf/uadappendixdfieldreqs.pdf.
Others use math to illustrate examples of AMC economics. "We
have someone in our office that is an appraiser, so we have a
little better insight into how some of the AMC’s work. Today he
received an order for a field review. What the order shows in
nothing short of ridiculous. The fee breakdown is as follows:
Customer fee $460, Vendor fee $125, AMC Mgmt fee $335. So 73% of
the fee charged to customer is being paid to the AMC for
ordering the appraisal?! My question to you is to find if there
is any government agency to report this to? Is there even any
agency that cares?"
Mark Eastman from SouthEastern
Evaluation wrote to me. "Over the past several years Real
Estate Appraisers have been dealing with increased demands in
the appraisal report. This is called in the profession as
“scope creep”. Back in the good old days when the appraiser
received an appraisal request it seemed a lot easier than it is
now. The appraiser would do the research, put three or four
comps in the report and send it to the client and very rarely
would there ever be any questions. Now days, with “scope
creep,” the appraiser’s engagement letter reads like an
instruction manual for a new gas grill. Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac have made substantial additions to the appraisal
guidelines. In 2009-2010 the Fannie Mae introduced of the
Market Condition Report (1004MC). This report requires the
appraiser to give marketing trends in increments: 7-12 months,
4-6 months and current – 3 months, Number of sales, absorption
rates, active listings and months of housing supply. Also the
median sales price, days on market, listing prices and the
medium sales price as a percent of average list price. All of
this information in the time increments listed above."
Mark continues, "Appraisers were told that no additional fees
were warranted as they were already researching this
information. This is just one of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac new
guidelines. This new requirement is only part of the increased
scope of work. Lenders
typically have overlay appraisal requirements. These may
include: two comparable sales in the past 90 days, aerial photo
of subject property, if subject property appraises for more than
one million it requires 4 comparables and two listings, urban
properties report distances in blocks, suburban in miles,
zoning-make the determination if property destroyed more than
50% can it be rebuilt, cost to cure on listed repairs, and a
turnaround time 4 days from when it was assigned.
"These are just a sample of the requirements from lenders and
appraisal management companies. Appraisers were very happy when
they read the section of Dodd Frank that addressed appraisal
fees. Appraisers were to be paid a fee that is “reasonable and
customary”. The verbiage in the Dodd-Frank bill was very
specific as to how to determine “reasonable and customary
appraisal fees”. Reasonable and customary was to be determined
WITHOUT including fees paid by appraisal management companies.
Simply stated only fees paid directly to appraisers by banks,
mortgage companies, and other entities could determine what is
“reasonable and customary.” Appraisers however were in for a
surprise when the Interim Final Rules were published. Suddenly
the small paragraph about R/C was 18 pages of verbiage with 2
presumptions of compliance. Presumption one allowed for
business as usual and that was the option that most AMC’s used.
For the appraisers it was a disappointing revelation of how our
government works with lobbyists.
"No one in the appraisal profession wants to set fees, however
between 60 -70% of all residential mortgages and appraisals flow
through 5 or 6 companies. This represents an oligopoly. They
set the appraisal fee market. It is not reasonable to think an
appraiser can effectively negotiate with one of these
multi-billion dollar banks. In my humble opinion the best way
is more transparency. AMC’s owned by banks have become profit
centers for the bank. More immediate profits are derived by
paying the appraisers less money. Again, this is short sighted
from the banks perspective. The old adage you get what you pay
for is true. If an appraiser is paid a reasonable market fee it
is reasonable to believe the report will be a higher quality
report.
"One of the quickest and best ways to fix this problem is
transparency. The AMC’s scope of work and their fee should be
negotiated separately with the lender. This way there is no
incentive to pay the appraiser less money. The appraiser’s fee
should be determined as detailed in the Dodd-Frank bill.
Surveys commissioned by Universities, trade organizations and/or
government entities are good way to determine what is
“reasonable and customary”.
The URAR was last updated in 2005. There are several new
valuation products on the market. These products can analyze
years of sales data in seconds. An appraiser skilled in
regression analysis can produce a statistically accurate
property valuation with local market knowledge. Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac are the drivers of the residential real estate
appraisal reports and acceptable methods. When they embrace
this new technology our profession will once again be a trusted
part of mortgage lending. There is no shortage of opinions on
how to fix our profession. There is no aspect of the mortgage
business that is easy. The Dodd-Frank bill is 2,300 pages of
new regulations that touched every aspect of the financial
sector. We all have to deal with a difficult changing
environment." If you'd like to reach Mark, write him at mchapman@see-amc.com
Of course classes dealing with appraisals abound. For example,
one is offered by Streetlinks Lender Solutions. "Lenders today
are faced with various options for managing their appraisal
process. Picking the right process that will appeal to a
marketplace's demand for speed, laser accuracy and competitive
costs can be daunting...in this webinar you will learn Process
Styles: AMC vs. Self-Managed appraisal solutions, Key
Considerations: Understanding and evaluating your own needs,
What to Look for in a Provider: Key questions for potential
appraisal management partners" You can go to: https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/540313873.
Lenders & investors are trying new things. For example, "To
better facilitate your appraisal request needs, Stearns Wholesale has just
added an alternative AMC. This now provides you with an
additional selection from the one that is accessible from the
Stearns Wholesale website." And last Thursday "Mountain West Financial
has partnered with AXIS Appraisal Management Solutions as
an additional appraisal resource option for your FHA and
Conventional transactions.”
Yesterday,
despite
the ISM Factory Index unexpectedly climbing, stocks dropped and
bonds rallied. For those in the mortgage biz, the Fed’s buying
program commenced yesterday, which may have helped 10-yr T-notes
rally more than a point and close near 1.79% although current
coupon MBS prices ended the day “only” better by .375-.50. But
what helped our rates more were the increased odds of a Greek
default.
For
fun today we have Chairman Bernanke's testimony on the "Economic
Outlook and Recent Monetary Policy Actions" before the Joint
Economic Committee beginning at 10AM EST, with the only economic
release being Factory Orders. In the early going stocks are
pointing lower (how are old folks supposed to retire when their
stocks keep going down?) and rates are lower: the 10-yr is down to
1.73% and MBS prices are better by another .125-.250.
Tom, an eighty-year-old rancher, was in town for his quarterly
supply visit. He had lost his wife and rumor had it that he was
marrying a “mail order” bride.
Being a good friend, the banker asked Tom if the rumor was true.
Tom said “yes” and with a wink said, "And she'll be twenty-one
before years out."
The banker knew the “appetite” of a young woman could not be
satisfied by an eighty-year-old.
The banker tactfully suggested that Tom should consider getting
a hired hand to help him out on the ranch (knowing nature would
take its own course).
Tom thought this was a good idea, “I sure needed some help.”
Four months later, Tom was in town again.
"How's the new wife?" asked the banker.
Tom proudly said, "Good - she's pregnant."
The banker, continued, "And the hired hand?"
Without hesitating, Tom said, "She's pregnant too."
NEVER underestimate old guys.