|
Nov. 21, 2011: FHA gets the nod, Fannie & Freddie don't; flood insurance changes; NMLS update; investor news with the BofA timeline
Rob Chrisman
Lots
of people in the real estate & mortgage businesses make a
lot of money. As we head toward Thanksgiving, sometimes it is a
good thing to remember that many people around the world don't.
The video is six minutes long, but you can get the message after
watching it for only two: http://biggeekdad.com/2010/10/two-dollars-a-day/.
The
video focuses on people too poor to move, but here in the U.S.
many can afford to move but don’t. A snapshot of 2010 showed
that 59% of us lived in
the same state in which we were born, per the Census
Bureau. Louisiana came in 1st with almost 80% of its residents
being born there, followed by MI (77%), OH, and PA. At the other
end of things, AK, AZ, FL, NV, and Washington DC all had less
than 40% of their residents being born in that state. (Nevada
was less than 25%.)
Congress
passed
a bill, and President Obama signed it, that allows the FHA to back
mortgages of up to $729,500, six weeks after the limit
dropped to $625,500. The move makes it easier for more buyers to
get low-interest FHA loans. Obviously members of Congress had
trouble letting Freddie & Fannie take on any more risk given
the billions in taxpayer money that have gone their way. The two
agencies are politically toxic, but legislators felt pressure to
re-raise the limit, so compromised by raising the FHA limit. Loans backed by Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac will continue to have a $625,500 limit.
Loans that exceed the Fannie, Freddie and FHA limits move into
the jumbo realm, as we know, where 30-yr mortgages carry higher
interest rates and require 20% or more down. FHA programs
usually allow lower down payments and are more forgiving of
imperfect credit, but also carry higher fees, so more-affluent
buyers tend to prefer Fannie and Freddie loans when they qualify
for them. Critics are quick to wonder about extending a high LTV
loan at a low interest rate under the FHA program rather than a
Fannie or Freddie program, but so be it.
Through
all
of this, it is useful to take a quick historical look at how the
government influenced Fannie & Freddie, and was instrumental
in putting the U.S. housing & credit markets where they are
today:
|