|
Dec. 12, 2011: Mortgage AE jobs; broker share increases; Las Vegas' foreclosed-upon property law; interesting joke
Rob Chrisman
Any
time I see "Jodie Foster," "housing scheme," "estranged father
“and, “cargo containers” in one sentence, I scramble for the
latest edition of People Magazine. Here it is on Yahoo: http://news.yahoo.com/jodie-fosters-dad-convicted-housing-scheme-155858488.html.
Some
companies
in the industry continue to expand, some larger than others.
TMSFunding Wholesale Lending (part of Total Mortgage Services -
headquartered in Connecticut) is seeking wholesale AE's in 21
states ranging from California to Maine through North Carolina,
Texas, Florida, Michigan, Vermont, and fourteen others (GA, IL,
MA, MD, MS, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, SC, TN, VA, and DC) . The
preferred AE candidate has an existing broker base funding
traditional, FHA, USDA, and jumbo loans. The company's website
can be found at http://www.tmsfunding.com/,
and all resumes should be sent to wholesale@tmsfunding.com.
Any
company servicing loans in Las Vegas should note that, “Banks
that own vacant, dilapidated properties in Las Vegas could face
fines or jail time under a city ordinance approved Wednesday.
The City Council voted unanimously for an ordinance that
requires banks to list empty, foreclosed properties on a
registry and contains misdemeanor penalties for allowing a
property to fall into disrepair:” http://www.lvrj.com/news/las-vegas-council-approves-foreclosure-ordinance-135201403.html?ref@3.
Is John Stumpf or Jamie Dimon going to do time in the Big House?
Probably not, although there is a maximum $1,000, six months in
jail penalty.
The
"why do borrowers walk away from house loans and not car
loans?" conversation continued
into the weekend. Ray W. observed, "You can sleep in your car
but you can't drive your home." Karin B. writes, "It is more
expensive to rent a car than to buy one. Then, most people tend
to lease a car, and never own one. Or a car loan is 3-5 years,
often with no interest or 1% interest. The house they are
walking away from is at 6% for 30 years – it is a simple
business decision to cut losses on an under-performing
investment. Those that walked in 2007 and kept their credit
intact, except for the mortgage, can now get back into the
market and buy the same house they left for 50% less (in some
markets) at 2% lower interest rate than they had. They money
they did not pay on high interest mortgage was saved, and now
they have nice down payment.”
Keith
L. reminds us, "And does anyone ever take into consideration
that the mortgage payment is tax deductible whilst rent is not?
LO’s should help borrowers calculate the net cost vs. renting
first before dumping the house."
Joe M. writes, "If I spent $500K on a stock based on say a 10
year outlook, and in year two that stock was now worth $100K, am
I expected to cry to the government and/or my neighbors to
“help” me out since I can’t get my original $500K back? Or,
since I invested for the long term, should I wait to see if all
or some of it will come back by year 10. I think what most folks
forget about is that, at its core, buying a home is an
investment. Investments can go both up and down. Not
only that, but these investments were all paid for basically on
“margin” with a bank’s money used as the investment capital - in
most cases these were 30 year loans. Because your investment is
down in year 2 or 3, you should bail without the penalty of the
margin call? Just because they got caught up with competing
with their family/neighbors on buying the biggest house on the
block we should not have to bail them out when it turns out that
they can’t afford it? They take the loss on their investment and
move on: it’s called renting."
Steve T. wrote, among other things, "Why would borrowers
continue to make car loan payments when they know that as soon
as they drive it off the lot it is worth less than the loan and
not make payments on home loans? Because they are constantly
barraged with useful idiots blaming ‘greedy bankers’ and evil
mortgage brokers for making profits and ‘causing the housing
bubble.’ They are not willing to look in the mirror and say, ‘I
screwed up when I signed for that pay option ARM,’ or, ‘maybe I
should not have done that 100% Stated loan on my rental.’ And
regarding the comment on the predominance of short sales, I’m
calling ‘B.S.’ here. This line of reasoning is equivalent to a
teenager saying ‘everyone else is doing it.’ Just because
‘everyone else’ is defaulting on their obligation, does not mean
we need to condone or encourage it?”
In a blurb from American Banker, it reports, “Perhaps the future
for loan brokers isn't so bleak after all. Wholesale lenders
table funded almost $33 billion of loans in the third quarter,
giving the channel a 9.2%
market share, according to new figures compiled by
National Mortgage News and the Quarterly Data Report. In the
first and second quarters of this year brokers had market shares
of 6.8% and 7.9%, respectively. The 6.8% figure marked an
all-time low for the industry. Three years ago they had a 19%
share.”
Many
mortgage
banks use ViewPoint as a warehouse lender. Late last week ViewPoint Financial Group
and Highlands Bancshares announced that they have entered into
a “definitive merger agreement whereby ViewPoint will
acquire Highlands and its subsidiary bank, the First National
Bank of Jacksboro (which operates in the Dallas marketplace as
Highlands Bank), in a stock-for-stock transaction. This
strategic acquisition increases ViewPoint's footprint in the
Dallas marketplace while maintaining ViewPoint's strong capital
position. (The deal) has an aggregate implied value of
approximately $71.0 million in ViewPoint common shares.
Highlands is a privately owned commercial bank headquartered
near Dallas.
Wells
Fargo Wholesale Lending
told brokers it will implement new Fannie DU Refi Plus and
Freddie Mac Relief Refinance Mortgage price adjusters starting
today.
Stearns
Lending rolled out a new extension policy.
"Extensions are available for programs and rates currently
posted on our rate sheet only. Requests for extensions on Jumbo
loans, ARM loans or Specialty Products will be looked at on a
case-by-case basis. Requests for extensions can be made no
earlier than 5 days prior to the lock expiration but must be
made before the lock expires. Free Extensions - (1st extension)
Available for loans locked with an original term of 21 days will
receive a one-time 3 calendar day extension. For loans locked
with an original term of 30 days or greater, a one-time 7
calendar day extension will be given, if requested, at no cost
within 5 days of expiration. A free extension is not applicable
if initial lock term was 14 days. Extensions at a Cost - (2nd
extension or if initial lock term was a 14 day term) Extensions
are available at a cost of 2.5 bps pts. per day (.025%) up to 30
days, without regard to market condition (better or worse). All
extension requests must be made prior to the lock expiring.
Relocks (up to two): If the lock has expired and current market
pricing is the same or better: you may relock for 10 days for
.125 pt. cost or 20 days for .25 pt. cost. If the lock has
expired and current market pricing is worse, you will use worse
case pricing from the lock term you originally locked with (i.e.
14, 21, 30, 45 or 60 day) plus the relock fee. You can relock
for 10 days at .125 pt. cost or 20 days at .25 pt. cost." (See
the lock policy for full details by product type).
How
about these rates!? No one in the mortgage business is
complaining about them – but what trends are developing? Our
fixed income markets are “caught between the opposing forces of
strengthening U.S. economic data and the
must-be-a-crisis-somewhere Eurodebacle.” So reports Paul Jacob
with Banc of Manhattan.
“But several trends have caught our attention that,
collectively, suggest a potential range break to higher yields.”
Mr. Jacob sums up that U.S. data has been on a solid run
especially on the consumer side, stocks are “hanging tough,” and
volatility has decreased on various levels. , the lock-step
stock-bond correlation has been weakening. And if the bond
market is not quite so crisis-obsessed, yields have to be
justified in the context of economic fundamentals and a 2%
10-year isn’t compatible with 4% nominal GDP growth.
For
economic news this week we have zip today, aside from continued
gyrations from Europe (which will be with us for months and
years). Tomorrow we can look forward to Retail Sales, if that is
the correct term, and Wednesday is some import/export price
data. Thursday is Jobless Claims, Personal Income and
Consumption, the Producer Price Index (remember in the old days
when inflation mattered?) and an Empire State Manufacturing
number. Friday is the Consumer Price Index. (Things will be
pretty quiet after that with many heading off for holiday
vacations.) Rates are a
shade better today with the 10-yr down to 2.02% and MBS prices
about .125 better.
(This tale is meant for entertainment only, and may or may
not reflect the views of the editor.)
An economics professor at a local college made a statement that
he had never failed a single student before, but had recently
failed an entire class. That class had insisted that Obama's
socialism worked and that no one would be poor and no one would
be rich, a great equalizer.
The professor then said, "OK, we will have an experiment in this
class on Obama's plan". All grades will be averaged and everyone
will receive the same grade so no one will fail and no one will
receive an A (substituting grades for dollars - something closer
to home and more readily understood by all).
After the first test, the grades were averaged and everyone got
a B. The students who studied hard were upset and the students
who studied little were happy. As the second test rolled around,
the students who studied little had studied even less and the
ones who studied hard decided they wanted a free ride too so
they studied little.
The second test average was a D! No one was happy.
When the 3rd test rolled around, the average was an F.
As the tests proceeded, the scores never increased as bickering,
blame and name-calling all resulted in hard feelings and no one
would study for the benefit of anyone else.
To their great surprise, ALL FAILED and the professor told them
that socialism would also ultimately fail because when the
reward is great, the effort to succeed is great, but when
government takes all the reward away, no one will try or want to
succeed.
It could not be any simpler than that.
If you're interested, visit my twice-a-month blog at the
STRATMOR Group web site located at
|