|
Feb. 4, 2012: Libertarian letters from the trenches; investor updates
Rob Chrisman
For
this Saturday edition, don't
forget about the payroll tax cut - recall the big battle
back in December that only produced a bill that lasts through the end of this month?
And the g-fee tax that will be with us and the agencies for the
next 10 years? And how politicians who want to do away with
Fannie and Freddie seem to conveniently forget that?
Negotiations have been taking place over the last few days to
extend the cut through year-end. There are 25 days left
technically but really only 18 working ones, including
President’s Day. So we’ll all be fortunate enough to see this
Congressional fight coming up in the press again.
Let's
take some calls from listeners. How about Denver? "Rob, when
will the madness stop? Didn’t
companies like Lehman Brothers, WAMU, TBW, Countrywide, etc.
send out reassuring messages to their clients soon before
their failure? It almost seems that any time a company
feels the need to send out a ‘We firmly stand behind’ note, it
is the ‘kiss of death’.” (Editor’s note: yes, it does almost
seem like a company is ‘damned if they do, damned if they don’t’
when it comes to notices like that – they can’t ignore the
rumors, but sending out a note means that management feels
there’s cause to do so.)
Another
wrote,
“The hairs on the back of my neck stood up last week when the
purchase of a cleared loan was delayed by PHH for ‘computer
issues’. This week the story changed to ‘second level review’.
After having to go back to the borrowers for a few items before,
including a full 30 days of paycheck stubs, that were requested
for seemingly no good reason, we got hit with 7 more stips
yesterday that even made less sense. These last 7 came in 3
different faxes! We have never experienced anything like this
before unless the investor was about to dramatically scale
back.”
With
all the government-related news this week, I received this note.
"Throughout the entire meltdown of the mortgage and real estate
market I have been screaming that the media and politicians have
it all wrong. While certainly there have been improprieties by
some dishonest industry players, I feel the US consumer is
as much or more to blame. Case in point, I received a
three page certified letter in the mail this week from a
borrower requesting that my bank reassign the servicer on their
loan, lower their interest rate and grant them access to their
current equity. Keep in mind that we sell 100% of our loans as a
correspondent lender and that this loan was originated and sold
to a large servicer back in 2008. According to the letter, this
client was ‘courted’ by the larger servicer to refinance using
the HARP program in late 2010 and after serious thought the
borrower decided to proceed with the refinance. They were
immediately told they would not qualify for HARP because they
were current on their payments. To their own admission they
argued and then pursued the program further. After more
consideration, the borrower decided to strategically default on
their loan in order to gain access to the wonderful HARP
program. Well, you can guess what happened next. After a few
months of red tape and delays (which probably did happen) the
borrower started to receive foreclosure notices. Numerous phone
calls later they decided to get current and stop the
foreclosure. They have since tried to buy a car and do a regular
refinance but have been derailed by damaged credit scores. Now,
they are back here asking for help while mentioning the word
lawsuit. I am sure the larger servicers are trying their best,
not telling anyone to stop making payments and probably are
drowning in red political tape of their own. Hopefully, this
borrower has something in writing from the servicer telling them
to not make payments which just might help their case. My
concern is while the
administration continues to demonize our industry and
credit-worthy borrowers continue to hurt themselves, it
demonstrates we still have a long road to travel before we see
the light. Don’t even get me started on the misleading
‘trigger’ lead industry and our broken disclosure regulations.
‘Intent to Proceed’ forms? Really?"
And another note: "I guess the political speak of 'A Chicken in
every Pot' has evolved. This is so much wrong in the real world
with most of Obama’s 'Plan' that I don’t know where to even
start with consequences. [Sarcasm!] Why doesn’t he make it real
simple and just outlaw all mortgage debt, wipe it clean, every
home owner gets their home debt free today. And in ‘fairness’
let all renters just ‘own’ their unit they live in today
collectively like a condo with the other tenants? That way in
the name of 'fairness', everyone today owns a home free &
clear. Of course then, how do we make it fair that some have
7,000 sq. ft. estates in the suburban hills, and some just have
an apartment shared with 400 other 'owners' of their units in
crime ridden areas. The 'fairness' argument never ends until
there is nothing left and no one has anything. 90% of this has
no chance (I hope) and is just another play in the class warfare
game of his electioneering. I’m embarrassed our country has come
to this. Wealth seizures are alive and well in their minds."
"Rob - I am taking a continuing education class on line and this
is one of the pages from a mortgage fraud class. It looks like
we just need to get rid of these mortgage brokers and everything
will clear itself up. [Sarcasm.] The text says, 'Between the
mid-1980's and 2007, the depository institution's role in
mortgage lending diminished greatly, and mortgage brokers
stepped in to fill this vacuum. Mortgage brokers originate
mortgage loans for a fee, and then submit the loans to wholesale
lenders or funding companies. In many cases, the lender will
then sell the loan on the secondary market. According to
referenceforbusiness.com, mortgage brokers' share of the market
rose steadily from 20% in 1987 to 55% in 2001. The National
Association of Mortgage Brokers reported that in 2004, mortgage
brokers originated 68 percent of all mortgage loans in the
United States. However, as a result of the housing and credit
crisis, the number of loans originated by brokers fell
precipitously, to between 10 and 20% of the market by late 2009.
New state and federal mortgage broker licensing requirements,
prohibitions on "yield-spread premiums", and HUD's prohibition
on mortgage brokers ordering their own appraisals have also
played havoc with the profession. Mortgage brokers maintain
there is no connection between brokers and fraud, and that a
mortgage broker is no more likely to engage in fraud or poor
lending practice than other parties involved in a mortgage
transaction. However, a
Columbia University study in 2009 found that loans originated
by mortgage brokers between 2004 and 2008 were 50% more likely
to end in foreclosure than loans that were originated directly
by banks.'"
On
to some investor notes. Citi
issues some recommendations in decreasing loans held up for
review due to processing issues. A copy of the “Goodbye Letter”
that the Correspondent sent to the borrower must be sent as a
trailing document. The Escrow Account Information box on the
Good Faith Estimate (GFE) must match the HUD-1 Settlement
Statement. If the Escrow Account Information box reflects "Yes"
for an escrow account deposit, the HUD-1 Settlement Statement
should show retained escrow funds. If an escrow account deposit
is waived or not collected at closing, the final GFE should
reflect that an escrow account was not required. Per the
Instructions for Completing HUD – 1 Settlement Statements, the
full and complete Settlement Agent address and place of
settlement must be shown in Section H on the HUD-1—the name only
is not sufficient. A detailed itemization of all the fees
associated with the loan must be included in the loan file, and
the total of the itemized fees should match the lump sum fees
disclosed on the final GFE and charged on the HUD-1. For VA
loans, Lenders must either itemize the Origination charge in the
empty 800 lines of the HUD-1 to the left of the column or
provide a separate “Origination Statement” indicating the
purpose of the charge and the amount. If the “Origination
Statement” option is used, the statement must be signed and
dated by the borrower.
Wells
Fargo's correspondent division
told clients that customers refinancing under Fannie’s
DU Refi Plus program will be able to take advantage of HARP’s
recent enhancements, effective with registrations and/or locks
on and after February 6, 2012, as the bank has now aligned
its policy with Fannie’s. The “enhancements” - benefit to
borrower - will allow for a reduced monthly P&I payments, a
diminished loan amortization term, and a lower interest rate. (The
LTV/CLTV offered by Fannie continues to be unavailable.)
On January 30th, Wells began using Rural Developments Guarantee
Fee & Annual Fee Calculator in assessing applications for
Guaranteed Rural Housing Loan funding packages. As such, a copy
of the lender’s RD-1980-19 Loan Closing Report is no longer
required. Its Seller Guide (Section 300.02, 51, Real Estate
Appraisals) has been amended slightly, with the changes
addressing an appraiser’s potential conflict of interest and
Wells Fargo’s relationship to appraisal provider Rels Valuation.
A reminder has been issued that FHA loans for properties in PUDs
require 100% of the insurable replacement cost of the units
exterior and interior improvements, be they already installed or
later upgraded - detached PUDs are, however, exempt. And because
of changes to the MERS, sellers must initiate the Transfer of
Beneficial and Servicing rights transactions within five days of
the transfer date, and Original Mortgagee loans must be
registered within a week of the Note date (non-escrowed states)
or the funding date (escrowed states) - February 27th.
Wells
Fargo
also released their investment property pricing adjuster and
cash-out refinance pricing adjuster changes, which come into
effect 3/1 for Best Effort Locks and Mandatory Commitments,
Assignments of Trade, and Specified Bulk Commitments. The
Wholesale Lending Division has also released the deadlines on
Conforming loans as dictated by recent Congressional action.
Conditions must be received by 2/13, loans must be clear to
close by the 17th (the 20th for non-escrow states), and closing
documents for Refinance loans in escrow states must be signed by
the 22nd. They’re also cracking down on self-employed
borrowers, whose income must meet the income standards as
written in the Home Equity Broker Guide—no exceptions!
US Bank told clients
that as of 1/30 FHA refinance applications were subject to the
FHA regulation that premium pricing cannot serve as payment of
any upfront mortgage insurance premium (UFMIP), which is not
technically a “closing” cost. Apparently the documentation of
gift funds on FHA loan files is still an issue, particularly
when the gift is in the form of a cashiers’ check and the
appropriate withdrawal documents are not received. Underwriters
are now required to make an amended Closing condition, which
will then be verified by the Closing/Funding Department. The US
Bank Home Mortgage Wholesale Division has even issued a handy
chart outlining exactly what to do in nine different gift fund
scenarios. VA loan files delivered to purchase in the past six
weeks have been required to follow new requirements for property
interior photographs as well as value adjustments to the
Department of Veterans Affairs Notice of Value by Lender’s Staff
Appraisal Reviewers.
Fifth Third Mortgage,
due to the changed g-fees, told clients that conventional loans
with pre-January 3rd initial lock date are subject to an
additional 50bps adjustment pricing for any extension past March
3rd. This is a one-time charge additional to the
listed standard extension fees, including the free 3-day
extension. Loans that utilized a float down after January 3rd
have an initial lock date past the cutoff, Non-Agency Jumbo and
Government Products are all exempt from the charge.
In
honor of tomorrow's football game, Steve Wozniak, of Apple
Computer fame and from whom I receive a fair number of my jokes,
wrote, "This is a true story...I thought it was a great artistic
achievement with sci-fi and rebel and individualism overtones
and that the board considered the Super Bowl time too
expensive...I remarked to Jobs that we should show it because
'This is who we are.'" And thus the story of how the most famous
Super Bowl commercial was almost cancelled: http://gizmodo.com/5882178/how-the-best-super-bowl-commercial-was-almost-cancelled-by-apple.
If
you're interested, visit my twice-a-month blog at the STRATMOR
Group web site located at
|