Apr. 3, 2012: Mortgage hiring continues; HARP input from LO's & investors; comment on the CFPB's RESPA & TILA proposals
Rob Chrisman
Things
are decent in the mortgage
insurance biz: MI companies wrote $5.4 billion in new
pools of risk in February. Mortgage Insurance Companies of
America (MICA) includes numbers from its members like Genworth,
MGIC, and Radian, but not from companies such as UG or Essent –
two big “up ‘n comers.”
And
some mortgage companies are continuing to expand as their
business grows. I have been retained by a San Francisco Bay
Area-based wholesale lender that is looking for underwriters,
funders, and Broker Service Representatives (processors) for
its San Francisco and East Bay branches. The company
offers A-Paper Agency and jumbo loans and has a reputation of
exceptional service and leading edge technology. The company
lends in 3 states, has plans to expand into 15 more, and is
projecting to fund approximately $3 billion in 2012 (versus $1.5
billion in 2011. They also expect to reach $2 billion in
servicing this year. If you’re interested or know someone who
is, resumes should be sent to me at rchrisman@robchrisman.com.
And in another part of the country, Franklin American Mortgage
Company is currently searching for a Regional Sales Manager
for its Wholesale Division. As most know, FAMC is one of the
top 5 non-bank lenders in the U.S. The candidate would be
responsible for the recruiting, hiring and development of AE’s
in OH, MI, IN, NC, DE, VA, WV, and the Washington, D.C. area.
Additionally, FAMC is
looking to hire AE’s in its Western Region (Houston,
Chicago, St. Louis, Los Angeles and WI) and it’s Eastern Region
(GA, OH, VA, NC, FL, MS, and MI). The company has four wholesale
sites around the nation, is FHA Direct Endorsed, VA Automatic, a
LAPP authority and a Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae
Approved seller/servicer. Please submit resumes to Deepa
Holland at dholland@franklinamerican.com.
Warehouse
banks
provide the life-blood for non-depository lenders. Noting the
recent issues that some lenders are having with ewarehouse, Jack
Nunnery with Texas
Capital Bank writes, "Warehouse banks perform considerable
due diligence on their mortgage banking partners. I believe it
is prudent the mortgage banker perform due diligence on the
warehouse bank. Whether or not the warehouse bank is a new name
in the space or an existing warehouse bank, I recommend the
mortgage banker go on site at the warehouse lender’s operation
center and make sure the counterparty is an acceptable 'fit'.
The warehouse bank is a critical component in any mortgage
bank’s strategic vision. Why not kick the tires?"
A few readers wrote in to say that they had reported
ewarehouse to the FBI, and to remind others to do the
same. In addition, those harmed should provide all the sales
people's names, addresses, phone numbers, etc. and any known
persons to GSA and HUD so that they appear on LDP and GSA lists
and are banned from government activity. And David Akre with
Whole Loan Capital reminds us that not only are there plenty of
legitimate warehouse banks looking for business but there is
also a group on Linkedin for warehouse lending: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Warehouse-Lending-3719693.
For
upcoming events, all NAMB
members are invited to join NAMB President, Don Frommeyer, for
an hour-long conversation with the Director of the CFPB, Mr.
Richard Cordray. “This webinar is limited to the first 1,000
registrants” and it is your opportunity to ask the CFPB Director
specific questions which relate to our profession: http://www.namb.org/assnfe/ev.asp?ID3.
And
out in California, the CMBA's
3rd Annual Sales & Marketing Conference is taking
place next week near San Francisco. It is only $40 and this year
is “focusing on retail, wholesale, correspondent lending, and
industry information that will prepare you for tomorrow's
mortgage market!” For the complete line up go to http://www.cmba.com/new/brochures/SM12Reg.pdf.
How
about some HARP 2.0 chatter from the origination trenches? An
LO from North Carolina wrote, "I have been taking applications
and declining lots of Harp 2.0 loans. Yes, declining. I have
taken a dozen of these loan applications and here is what I have
found. If your loan is owned by Fannie Mae you are in good
shape. If your loan is owned by Freddie, you have a higher
chance of your loan being declined for all the reasons Obama
tried to remove in his HARP 2.0 announcement. Here is a sample
what Freddie is declining: credit card balances exceeding 50% of
the credit limit, LTV’s over 125%, debt ratios over 45%. These
are things that are Freddie-specific in LP. This has been a
surprise and most originators did not expect this to be the
case. Fannie, on the other hand, in my experience, has been
approving loans regardless of LTV, DTI ratios are being approved
over 60%, and there are no credit card balance criteria. I
would speculate that Freddie will have pressure in the future to
have more relaxed underwriting, but as of right now, it is not
really helping the homeowner."
A mortgage company owner wrote, “I am not a big fan of the
program, and am seeing LO's salivating for this new "race to the bottom".
As REFI shops compete I can already hear, "We will go to 350%
LTV! My thoughts are: 1) we are not going to do any of these
that we sell to an aggregator. 2) We will only sell direct to
FNMA. 3) We will not do any that exceed an LTV of 120%. This
last point is not going to make me very popular with the LO's
but going broke is not going to make me very popular with my
wife and kids. The fact is that that we are still seeing a lot
of fraud out there - I think more than we have in our 25 years.
I am not going to let HARP 2.0 become a vehicle which easily
allows someone else's monkey to jump from their back to mine.”
If
a company can originate a loan at a discount, say, charging the
borrower .5, and put it into a security and sell it on the
secondary market at a premium, say, 2 points above par, that
would be a good way to make some ducats. As every LO knows, the largest banks are
doing exactly that by charging relatively high interest rates
to borrowers that qualify for HARP 2.0. Reporter Kate
Berry reports that Wells, BofA, and Chase rank first, second,
and third, respectively, in terms of housing receivables,
controlling 52% of the market, according to figures compiled by
National Mortgage News and the Quarterly Data Report. And per an
officer at Barclays, "HARP borrowers are kept captive to their
existing servicers and as a result have to pay a higher rate"
than new borrowers would. That bodes well for banks' profits,
since they are spending less on the refi’s than they would on
newly-originated loans, while getting more revenue at the same
time.
The implications of the HARP’s continue. Paul Jacob (Banc of Manhattan)
observes that, “We’ve seen a tremendous pickup in originator
selling of MHA-HARP related pools in the past week. Issuance of
the highest LTVs exploded in March, running at three times the
average pace of the past year. We also saw very big increases
in selling of TBA-eligible tiers earlier this week (100% Refi
80-90 LTV, 90-95, etc.). MHA/HARP supply can only come from one
place: refi’s on May 2009 and earlier Fannie and Freddie
originations. We believe the supply explosion in HARP pools
raises the possibility of faster-than-expected CPR prints on
seasoned high coupons in the upcoming prepayment report. If so,
we're likely to see high coupon MBS prices come under pressure
in the coming weeks.” In other words, investors are indeed tuned
in to the fact that older Fannie & Freddie loans could
indeed be paying off early, regardless of LTV.
Honestly,
I
lose track of what the CFPB
is involved in, versus what they're not involved in yet. The
CFPB threw its weight into the courtroom recently by filing a
friend-of-the-court brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
tenth circuit. The issue is whether homeowners can cancel their loans within a
three-year period stipulated under the Truth-in-Lending Act,
and whether a plaintiff need sue within the same timeframe
before the right of rescission expires. The case in Denver
involves a borrower who sued for an injunction against servicer
HSBC in 2009 when an earlier notice of rescission went
unnoticed. The CFPB is arguing that the borrower had met the
minimum standards for rescission by filing it and that she
required adequate disclosure forms from her servicer before it
moved forward with foreclosure for her property. The CFPB also
charged that earlier courts have “erroneously” thrown out
rescission lawsuits on the presumption that a homeowner needs to
file notice of rescission within three years. The CFPB said that
it plans to invoke the same legal authority by filing amicus
briefs in appellate cases from three other circuits. “We are
committed to making sure that borrowers can exercise their
rights to the full extent allowed under this law,” CFPB Director
Richard Cordray said in a statement. “The consumer’s right to
cancel gives lenders a powerful incentive to provide the
disclosures that consumers need to make good financial choices.”
What does the future hold
for combined RESPA and TILA regulation? Things are still
very much up in the air, but the CFPB gave investors their first
indication in late February when it announced that it was
forming a panel to get feedback from small business mortgage and
settlement companies regarding the new combined RESPA and TILA
disclosure forms and released a list of proposals currently
under consideration. Lenders will be most interested in the fact
that the CFPB is considering adding fees to the zero tolerance
category, where there’s already risk in that lenders are
accountable for any fees that may exceed the GFE and HUD-1
Settlement Statement. The fees would be charged by the lender’s
affiliated service providers, which means that lenders would
have to be diligent with disclosing them on the estimate
disclosure. If the fees charged by an affiliated title
insurance company, for example, turned out to be higher than
indicated on the estimate disclosure, the lender would be
responsible for customer refunds as well.
One of the big questions here is whether or not the CFPB
actually has the legal authority to impose tolerance
restrictions on lenders. The changes could affect a number of
other areas, including the definition of “application,” which
would expand the circumstances under which disclosures would be
necessary; the language used in pre-application summaries of
loan terms and settlement fees; average cost pricing; and
electronic recordkeeping. Everything is still in the discussion
stage, so for those interested putting in their two cents, the
CFPB will be accepting public comment until July 2012: http://www.consumerfinance.gov/notice-and-comment/.
All
of this is much more interesting than our interest rates. The
U.S. 10-yr closed at 2.22%, still good but we saw some investor
rate changes Monday. Pretty much the only news was the ISM
Manufacturing Index which came in pretty much as expected, but
traders reported that they were seeing a lack of buyers, causing
prices to drop and rates to nudge higher. Part of this might be
caused by nervousness about the employment data coming out on
Friday which is also an early close due to Good Friday. But in the early going
rates are right back down, with the 10-yr at 2.16% and MBS
prices better by .125-.250.
SOUTHERN KNOWLEDGE (Part 1 of 2)
A possum is a flat animal that sleeps in the middle of the road.
There are 5,000 types of snakes and 4,998 of them live in the
South.
There are 10,000 types of spiders. All 10,000 of them live in
the South, plus a couple no one's seen before.
If it grows, it'll stick ya. If it crawls, it'll bite cha.
Onced and Twiced are words.
It is not a shopping cart, it is a buggy!
“Jawl-P?” means “Did y'all go to the bathroom?”
People actually grow, eat, and like okra.
Fixinto is one word. It means I'm fixing to do that.
There is no such thing as lunch. There is only dinner and then
there is supper.
Iced tea is appropriate for all meals and you start drinking it
when you're two. We do like a little tea with our sugar. It is
referred to as the Wine of the South.