I
saw a classified ad recently where a person had a vintage French
military rifle for sale. The description said “Mint condition,
never fired; only dropped twice”.
We
receive housing news a lot more than twice a month. Every week,
it seems, some source publicizes a measure of the housing market
in the United States. I made a quick list of the
housing-related economic news that proliferate our monthly
lives. I am sure I missed some, but we have Housing
Starts, Building Permits, FNC’s latest Residential Price Index
(RPI), the S&P/Case-Shiller 20-city price index, the FHFA
house price index, Pending Home Sales, New Home Sales, Existing
Home Sales, CoreLogic National Foreclosure Report, and the
Zillow Real Estate Research.
But
wait, there’s more: Lender Processing Services (LPS)'s Mortgage
Monitor Report, RealtyTrac's foreclosure numbers, the National
Association of Home Builders' (NAHB) Remodeling Market Index,
Gallup.com's U.S. Homeownership, the U.S. Census Bureau's
vacancy rates for owner & rental properties, the RPX Monthly
Housing Market Report (put out by Radar Logic), Fannie Mae's
National Housing Survey, etc. What is anyone supposed to
pay attention to when there are literally dozens of indices?
Darned if I know – maybe they should agree to at least come out
on the same day of the month…
And
what’s it all telling us? Well, Wells Fargo's economic team
suggest that early reports show that the critical spring home
buying season has gotten off to its best start in five years.
“Sales of new single-family homes totaled 83,000 units during
the first quarter, up 16 percent from a year ago, while sales of
existing single-family homes rose 7.2 percent, marking the best
combined pace for first quarter home sales since 2007. The rise
in existing home sales has generated a little excitement, as
news is spreading that homes sold outside the foreclosure
process are often receiving multiple bids and selling above the
asking price.”
Wells
suggests
that “the sudden prevalence of multiple bids around the country
appears to be the result of unseasonably mild winter weather,
which brought buyers back into the market to a much greater
degree than sellers. The first quarter is typically the slowest
quarter of the year, with March being the only busy month.
Inventories of existing homes have fallen to just a 6.3-months’
supply, and the inventory of unsold vacant homes has fallen by
353,000 units over the past year. Inventories of new homes
continue to decline and are now at a paltry 144,000 units
nationwide. Only about one-third of those homes are actually
completed. With inventories dwindling, home prices have improved
a bit.”
Of
course Realtors can tell you that the better news on sales and
prices, along with near record high affordability and near
record low mortgage rates, has encouraged builders to move
forward with a few more projects. Starts of new single-family
homes rose 16.7 percent during the first quarter, for a total of
104,600 units.
But
the Jefferies Monthly
Housing Monitor took somewhat of the opposite tack: On the
surface it appears that momentum is building towards favoring a
near-bottom in U.S. housing. Small positives have emerged, as
they have in the past, but the data is “still
inconsistent enough to keep us concerned about such a fragile
sector. Nonetheless, it is easy to agree that mixed is
certainly better than down and the recent stronger-than-expected
pending homes sales report adds support. The positive spin is
that we haven’t seen material drops in recent months in most
housing data, and in some cases we have seen actual
improvements. The negative spin is simply that the market
remains saturated with inventory (lots in the “shadows”) and
that lending activity for home purchases remains exceptionally
tight in the face of record low costs of homeownership.”
Practically
everyone
agrees that if affordability is at record levels, the government
continues to try and prop up housing markets, so why are we
still mired in such a soft housing sector? On the lending side,
LO’s and underwriters can tell you that access to, and the
securing of, mortgage capital a challenge for many borrowers.
Origination is economically very lucrative for lenders, but lack
of clarity on future regulatory fronts and the costs of
compliance weigh heavily on the sector: simply put, lack of
clarity results in lack of funding.
Along those lines, Steve Kaye with Catalyst Funding
wrote, "A little over 2 years ago I went to see my Congressman,
Darrel Issa, to share a plan that stressed a more aggressive
approach to the housing crisis was necessary; one that extended
beyond simple loan modification. The “problem” with a straight
modification-only plan is that it only provides a temporary
solution – at best – and only addresses the mortgage payment –
which is no longer the only issue or concern. The homeowner who
is $150K or more upside down on his mortgage would absolutely
benefit from saving $500 a month or more on his mortgage
payment. However, when he wakes up the next morning, he is still
going to be $150K upside down on his mortgage and looking at a
minimum of 8-10 years at normal appreciation to climb out of
that hole. No…This is merely a band aide that would only extend
our housing woes."
He continued, "I lobbied for historic reform that would require,
in conjunction with the modification, a principal reduction plan
that would put home values at 100% of current market value --- a
‘clean start”, so to speak. It would not give the gift of
equity, but would provide some optimism and hope for the future.
And if the owner sold in the following 5 years, 50% of any
equity gained would have to be paid to the existing lender who
provided the modification/reduction. Other portions of the Plan
addressed additional ways to stimulate the market in regard to
expanding home ownership and purchasing power without
compromising normal loan qualifying. Clearly, we cannot
stimulate the housing market by only providing opportunity for
1st time homebuyers. Yes, there would be losses absorbed by
lenders and financial institutions However, the revitalization
and stabilization of the housing industry would stimulate the
economy and provide additional earnings through more home
lending, more use of credit, etc. Homeowners who are not upside
down will also gain as equity - lost during these past years –
will return and provide value. The more I have read over the
past year, the more I am convinced that these ‘simplistic’ ideas
will, in some manner, be put into play at some point --- they
have to. Oh…and Congressman Issa’s reply to me (actually his
assistant as the Congressman was in DC): “We need to get Obama
out of office before we can think about doing anything
aggressive”. It’s a shame that political agendas have to place
roadblocks on the economy’s recovery and extend hardships for
the American people. Steve Kaye at stevekayeloans@gmail.com.
When you're the government, you win some, and you lose some. The US government could
make a $15 billion profit on its 2008 bailout of insurer AIG,
a government auditor has estimated. The Government
Accountability Office, the investigative agency of the US
Congress, produced the forecast Monday as part of its regular
reports on the company’s rescue. Though the estimate could be
seen as premature – taxpayers still own most of the company’s
common shares – it provides yet another bright spot for a
bailout program which the Obama administration has sought to
trumpet for its apparent successes. GAO’s forecast is based on
the Treasury being able to shed its roughly 1bn shares of common
stock in AIG at the March 30 closing price of $30.83 and on the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York recouping the full value of its
holdings in the Maiden Lane investment vehicles that were
created as part of the rescue. A Treasury spokesman declined to
comment on the estimate. On Sunday, after the Treasury sold $5
billion of its stake in the company, an official said it
expected to recoup “every single dollar invested in the company”
per the Financial Times.
But on the other end of the credit and profit teeter-totter, Ally Financial, the
lender majority-owned by the US government, received a strong
signal from the US Treasury that it could proceed with a
bankruptcy of ResCap. A
Treasury official said that the department would not block a
bankruptcy for Residential Capital, which is struggling
with losses and litigation tied to bad loans, per the Financial
Times. The government owns 74% of Ally, which wants to shed
ResCap in the hope that it can abandon its liabilities. The
crunch date could come next week when about $1.4 billion of
loans extended by Ally to ResCap matures.
Turning
briefly to the markets, Tuesday saw some price improvements – as
if anyone is clamoring for lower rates. As ThomsonReuters
reported, “Meanwhile, the Fed, fast money and banks kept up with
originator supply and other selling through most of the day.
Mortgage banker selling appears to have picked up from recent
below normal levels of $2.0 billion to near or modestly above.
Pipelines are also growing with rates lower and this risks a
pickup in supply, especially if the market sells off. While
price levels encouraged profit taking, the looming 10-year note
auction tomorrow and 30-year bond auction on Thursday no doubt
were a factor as well as some concession to take down the longer
terms would not be surprising.”
By
the time the dust settled prices on mortgage-backed securities
were a little better, and the 10-yr T-note was up almost .375
closing near 1.84%. It is pretty darned early as I head to Texas
for few days, and I’ll be darned if I know where the market is.
There will be a $24 billion 10-year note auction scheduled at
1:00 pm, but there are two economic reports of interest but that
won’t move rates: the MBA's Mortgage Application Survey and the
Wholesale Trade figures for March.
Calling the Last Rites
Here in NY, a man is struck by a bus on a busy street in New
York City. He lies dying on the sidewalk as a crowd of
spectators gathers around.
"A
priest! Somebody get me a priest!" the man gasps. A policeman
checks the crowd but finds no priest, no minister, no man of God
of any kind.
"A PRIEST, PLEASE!" the dying man says again.
Then
out of the crowd steps a little old Jewish man of at least
eighty years of age.
"Mr.
Policeman,"
says the man, "I'm not a priest. I'm not even a Catholic. But
for fifty years now I'm living behind St. Mary's Catholic Church
on Third Avenue, and every night I'm listening to the Catholic
litany. Maybe I can be of some comfort to this man."
The policeman agrees and brings the octogenarian over to the
dying man.
He
kneels down, leans over the injured and says in a solemn voice:
"B - 4. I - 19. N - 38. G - 54. O - 72."
If
you're interested, visit my twice-a-month blog at the STRATMOR
Group web site located at