Aug. 20, 2012: Mortgage jobs coast to coast; spotlight back on LO comp and potential penalties; why mortgage rates maybe shouldn't be here
Rob Chrisman
If
you have some spare change sitting around, a $1.7 billion
portfolio of non-performing, federally insured home loans will
be offered for sale at auction next month. HUD is going to
sell 9,442 discounted loans (on September 12 through
SEBA and DebtX) with an average balance of $182k in pools
consisting of homes in Chicago, Phoenix, Newark (NJ), and
Tampa (FL). The FHA’s bulk sales began in 2010 with a pilot
program that offered buyers as much as 65% off unpaid loan
balances with the understanding that they would write down
debt and modify terms to help borrowers keep their homes. The
problem is a big one for HUD: per MBA stats, 9% of FHA-insured
mortgages were 90 days late or in foreclosure as of June
30 compared with 7.3% for all home loans. Foreclosure starts
on FHA-insured loans increased to 1.53% in the second quarter,
up 0.57% from the previous three months - the only type of
mortgage with an increase in foreclosure starts during the
period. For more information on the sale go to: https://www.debtx.com/Articles/Article.asp?cid74.
Hey,
here’s an opportunity a little off the beaten path. Mortgage
Success Source (MSS) has an immediate opening for a writer
on their Content team to write and edit consumer and
referral partner oriented marketing and content pieces for the
mortgage industry. (MSS is a “quality-driven B2B information
company that relies heavily on the passion, exceptional
talent, and commitment of their staff to deliver world-class
business information services to the mortgage loan officer
market.”) The requirements for interested candidates include a
Bachelor’s degree in Marketing, English, Journalism, or
related field and 5+ years of business, content, technical, or
marketing writing experience. Interested candidates should
send a resume and cover letter along with their salary
requirements and a writing sample to humanresources@mssllc.com.
Subject Line: Writer. (To learn more about MSS, visit their
website at www.MortgageSuccessSource.com
or its Maryland-based parent company, UCG, at www.ucg.com.
In
San Diego, CA, Synergy 1 Lending is seeking a VP of
Secondary Marketing. The position will report directly
to the President and will be responsible for all things
secondary: pricing, lock desk, best price execution,
allocation, investor relationships, etc. The candidate must
have 5 years minimum experience in Secondary. Interested
individuals should submit their resume in confidence to Brad
Nease, the President of Synergy 1 Lending, at bnease@s1lending.com.
Across the continent in New York, Sterling National Bank
is seeking experienced underwriters, processors, and closing
specialists. Sterling is a federally chartered bank with
a “long, successful and consistent history in the mortgage
business.” Proven professionals who are looking for a career
opportunity will find one in this growing company. These
positions are based in the Residential Mortgage Division
Headquarters in Great Neck. Interested individuals should
submit their resume to Christine Bentley, Director of
Operations at cbentley@snb.com. For
more information on the bank visit www.snb.com.
Saturday
the commentary discussed the mortgage banker’s entry into the
world of FinCen and SAR’s, and I received this note from a
Wall Street vet: "Rob, your BSA comments are very interesting
and long overdue in the mortgage banker world. We in retail,
commercial and investment banking have embraced these rules
for many years now. The question I would pose is what
recourse does a banker have when holding definitive
information that a mortgagor has perpetrated bank/tax fraud
but, not precisely the BSA kind? There exist a significant
number of ‘ABC-like’ agencies to whom one can report
institutional violations. Who to call when a mortgagor is a
bad to the core and influencing/instructing other mortgagors?"
Everyone was chatting about how the CFPB is now auditing
Weightwatchers – it seems they don’t like all the points they
are charging. Seriously, where does one start with the
latest out of the CFPB directed at the mortgage industry,
this time another set of salvos at LO comp? (Remember
the fun leading up to April 2011?) First, know that the public
will have 60 days, until October 16, to review and provide
comments on the proposed rules prior to the CFPB’s scheduled
issuance of final rules in January. 2013. (January is shaping
up to be a big month for the mortgage industry, CFPB-wise.)
Lenders may be required to make available no-fee, no-point
mortgages to make it easier for prospective homeowners to
comparison shop, unless consumers were “unlikely” to qualify
for such a loan, and offer interest rate reductions when
consumers did elect to pay such upfront points or fees.
“The
CFPB proposed the latest rule(s) in a series of
mortgage-related rules mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act. This
proposal seeks to amend regulations regarding upfront points
and fees and loan originator compensation, and to implement
other Dodd-Frank Act provisions regarding mortgage credit.
Generally, for closed-end mortgages, the rule would prohibit a
creditor or mortgage broker from imposing upfront points or
fees unless the creditor or broker first offers the consumer
an alternative loan with no such fees (a zero-zero
alternative). If the upfront fees are passed on to independent
third parties, or if the consumer is unlikely to qualify for
the alternative loan, this requirement would not be triggered.
The proposal provides separate safe harbors for transactions
that involve mortgage brokers and those that do not. The rule
also would refine an existing ban on loan originator
commissions to allow reductions in compensation to cover
certain increases in closing costs and to clarify when a
factor used as a basis for compensation is prohibited as a
‘proxy.’ Also with regard to compensation, the rule proposes
to revise restrictions on pooled compensation and to amend the
general ban on compensation of originators by both parties.
Additionally, the CFPB seeks to (i) establish originator
qualification requirements, (ii) restrict agreements that
require consumer disputes to be resolved through mandatory
arbitration, and (iii) prohibit the financing of premiums for
credit insurance.”
It
appears that the CFPB has backed away from the idea of forcing
mortgage lenders to charge a flat fee for making a loan.
Remember how, about 5 months ago, the bureau had said it might
require mortgage lenders to charge the flat fee? The idea was
to keep loan officers from steering borrowers into more costly
loans solely to receive greater compensation. But, as the
industry pointed out, the flat-fee concept would
disproportionately impact lower-income borrowers and could
lead to a complex structure of varying fees. Instead, the new
proposal would force lenders to reduce interest rates when
consumers pay upfront points or fees, and to make a no-point,
no-fee loan option available to qualifying borrowers. The
bureau said the latter requirement would allow consumers to
better compare different offers.
The industry quickly chimed in. "The MBA applauds the Bureau's
efforts to protect borrowers by eliminating steering and the
proposed rule appears to be a good step in that direction.
Consumers benefit from a vibrant and competitive mortgage
market with a diversity of players, and this rule, as it
relates to loan originator qualification and screening, should
ensure a level playing field for originators, regardless of
business model.”
Paul
Zoukis, with Mortgage Success Source, wrote about
industry trends and its clients, "Further regulation is
inevitable as the CFPB pursues its goals of eliminating unfair
lending practices while enhancing the consumer’s understanding
of the lending process. It's becoming clear that every aspect
of the sales process from advertising to the most informal
presentation will eventually be covered. Among our clients
the demand is for solutions that are flexible enough to
both evolve with this changing regulatory landscape and
provide unique competitive selling advantage. In a nutshell,
managing risk without stepping on the revenue air hose.”
And
Daniel Podesto, owner of Central Coast Lending out in
San Luis Obispo, California, prior to Friday’s news wrote the
following about the current LO comp dilemma: "Regarding LO
comp, I agree with the idea of forcing the loan officer to
agree to a price for their service and not deviate from that
price. Specifically, any improvement in prices throughout the
loan process due to market movement (YSP) should be passed on
to the consumer. And once again, the regulators missed the
boat by not requiring the same rules for the banks and
mortgage bankers. These companies still capture YSP and pay it
to their LOs as a “bonus” thanks to a loophole in the law. I
already said an agreed-upon price is good, but I don’t agree
with one-size-fits-all price-fixing mentality for every loan.
Loan officers across the board have set their margins higher
than pre-LO comp to ensure never making too little, and now
use the excuse that ‘the government fixed my compensation’
whenever compensation is called into question. Borrowers are
no longer allowed to negotiate the fee for this service.
Also, loan officers are no longer allowed to make less that
the fixed percentage, and no longer allowed to credit
borrowers for unexpected costs or unexpected increases to
costs. The problem with the mortgage industry was never fee
related, as evidenced by the 37% lower fees before government
regulation. The regulation was needed with loan programs
aggressive use of reduced documentation and loose underwriting
guidelines. Most, if not all, of those problems have already
been corrected, even overcorrected, and it’s time for the
government to step away and allow competitive forces to
dictate the acceptable price for the service of arranging a
mortgage. I fear it’s already too late… the longer the
current environment continues the more consumers accept the
inflated costs as acceptable." (The post, with an overview
about the entire government reform problem, can be seen at http://www.centralcoastlending.com/2012/08/mortgage-fees-30-percent-2008-government-regulation-blame/.)
While
attending a Lender's One conference last week, also
prior to the Friday announcement, one of the guest speakers,
an attorney out of DC, that deals extensively with all these
CFPB audits and LO Comp contracts, spoke at length about ABA's
and also warned that LO's need to realize that if they are
paid under an improper LO Comp plan that per Dodd Frank
(Section 14.04) that the LO is personally responsible ( as
well as his company) for triple damages of all commission
paid to them and legal fees on every client found to have been
closed under that improper comp plan as those clients were not
given access to equitable rates as the LO could price up to
make more with such illegal commissions structures as a point
bank. He said this would be most likely a class action and
not just a single client so the damages could be
substantial….pretty scary stuff. The attorney’s point was that
the MLO themselves would be liable (in addition to the
company) if they accept payment on a loan that is a flawed
or illegal plan. Interesting about the “whistleblowing”
too - human nature being what it is, some folks may allege
that company X has an illegal plan, just to try and slow down
their competition – perhaps? Nasty but imaginable."
On
to the current market! President Obama met with Treasury
Secretary Geithner in the Oval Office last week, and announced
that their new plan for an economic stimulus includes
Powerball tickets, Starbucks coupons, and selling Girl Scout
Cookies year around. Seriously, Friday was a slow day but we
still find rates high, perhaps higher than where they should
be. And really, nothing has happened on a fundamental basis to
any of the current issues to warrant rates shooting up. There
has been no resolution to the fiscal cliff (and no signs of
any imminent agreement). The Federal Reserve’s interpretation
of capital and liquidity rules has been more stringent than
most expected for the effect of regulatory changes on bank
credit growth. And economic growth has remained mediocre in
Europe and Asia. In the US, labor market data and retail sales
have improved a little at the start of Q3. But they have
definitely not been strong enough to really change anyone’s
opinion about our economy. So we find yields back to June
levels. I have not received the usual, "When will rates go
back down?" e-mails - perhaps LO's know that eventually they
will.
Overnight there was some stirring in Greece and Spain, but for
the U.S. markets, tomorrow we have the release of the July
FOMC meeting minutes, Wednesday is Existing Home Sales,
Thursday is Jobless Claims, a housing price index (FHFA's),
and New Home Sales. Friday is the volatile Durable Goods. In
the early going the 10-yr. T-note, which closed Friday at
1.82%, is now 1.83% and MBS prices are little changed.
Good
visual communication means not letting your message get lost
in translation. Below are some translated messages that didn't
quite hit the mark (part 1 of 2).
Athens hotel - Visitors are expected to complain at the office
between the hours of 9 and 11am daily.
Leipzig elevator - Do not enter the lift backwards, and only
when lit up.
Tokyo hotel - It is forbidden to steal hotel towels please. If
you are not a person to do such a thing is please not read
this notice.
Bangkok dry cleaners - Drop your trousers here for best
results.
Sarajevo hotel - The flattening of underwear with pleasure is
the job of the chambermaid.
Hong Kong tailor shop - Ladies may have a fit upstairs.
If
you're interested, visit my twice-a-month blog at the STRATMOR
Group web site located at www.stratmorgroup.com.
The current blog discusses the CFPB’s servicing proposals, for
better or worse. If you have both the time and
inclination, make a comment on what I have written, or on
other comments so that folks can learn what's going on out
there from the other readers.