Aug. 27, 2012: Mortgage jobs; thoughts and ramblings on the broker business model & current compensation; Wells' new HARP policy
Rob Chrisman
Well,
this is the week that many Secondary Marketing folks have been
dreading. It is the
last week of the month after a sell-off, and there are
plenty of LO's who are sweating those refi's closing on
time. Extension policies will be sent out, or pointed to
on websites, and bickered over. Not only that, but the
upcoming weekend is a 3-day weekend. Look for operations to be
partially staffed as folks take some summer vacation time or
head off at the end of the week.
Here
is a job a little off the beaten path. Advantage Credit
Inc. is looking for a Sales Director for the Northern
California region. Check out the firm’s website for more
information (www.advcredit.com), but
the 20 year old national mortgage credit reporting agency,
with a reputation for sharing knowledge and providing old
fashioned customer service, continues to grow and expand
nationally. The Regional Sales Director will be responsible
for developing new customers in the mortgage financial market
and acting as the customer’s credit consultant and helping
them grow their business. Candidates should send their resumes
to Jim Kaiser at jim@advcredit.com.
And Opes Advisors, Inc. is currently seeking an internal
Sales Support Representative to provide loan scenario
support for the sales department. Opes Advisors, an
independently owned mortgage banking and investment management
firm south of San Francisco, seems to be growing by leaps and
bounds. And it isn't like scenarios are becoming easier, so
this role is critical! The role fields loan scenario
questions, researches answers when issues arise, and responds
to various situations as they occur from the production staff.
And the person has to do things that I could never do: learn
the specific guidelines for the product offerings of the
mortgage banking division – become the “go to” expert in each
of the products, offer 24 hour turnaround time for loan
scenario questions, guide mortgage advisors, review credit
reports, AUS findings etc. - a jack of all trades and a good
entry into a good company. Confidential inquiries and resumes
should be sent to resumes@opesadvisors.com.
And
yes, I've taken to putting out commentaries on many Saturdays.
But for most folks, Saturday is a day off - except possibly in
the future under the CFPB's proposals. Attorney Brian Levy
observed, "Buckley Sandler’s summary of the new RESPA
TILA proposed regulation and I was shocked to see that the
CFPB intends to regulate Saturday right out of the mortgage
business’ weekend. 'Business day' is any calendar day
except a Sunday or a legal public holiday (New Year’s, Martin
Luther King Day, Washington’s Birthday, Memorial Day,
Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veterans Day,
Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas day). This is a change from
Regulation X's current definition of 'business day,' which is
'a day on which the offices of the business entity are open to
the public for carrying on substantially all of the business
entity's functions.'" And what is the definition of an
“application?” See this all in a portion of
BuckleySandler’s well written summary of the new CFPB Rule
combining TILA & RESPA disclosures: www.stratmorgroup.com.
"Rob, is the broker business model dead? Many of the
companies we sell to seem to be being squeezed. The agencies
will probably cap sales volumes based on net worth due to
counterparty risk. (I recently received this note: I attended
a conference where Fannie indicated that newly approved
sellers would be subject to a 20x net worth ANNUAL sales cap
to Fannie. They were also looking at how they were going to
apply this methodology/philosophy to existing sellers.
Further discussions indicated there may be “some” flexibility
in the 20x number… they had to start somewhere… but the
message is clear that they are moving down the path of
managing perceived counterparty risk through sales caps.)
Servicing is going to non-depositories due to Basel III,
investors have either exited wholesale or standardized their
pricing, etc."
Nah,
I don’t think it’s dead. I am not going to make a definitive
list here, because every time I make a list it excludes
someone. But suffice it to say plenty of firms have
stepped into the wholesale business channel void left by
BofA, Wells, ING, MetLife, and others. These easily come to
mind without even thinking: JMAC, Fairway Independent, First
Mortgage, Stearns, BofI, Maverick, Icon Residential, Sierra
Pacific, MSI, Norcom, Pinnacle, Provident, Flagstar, FAMC,
Kinecta, HomeStreet, Cole Taylor, REMN, 360 Mortgage, WCS,
Stonegate, Parkside, Towne, USA Direct, Norcom, and so on.
(Your best bet for a complete list is to consult the Scotsman
Guide, or National Mortgage News.)
There is no doubt that the broker channel has gone through
unprecedented change. Companies have exited the
business. Others have increased their minimum net worth
requirements, file documentation requirements, counterparty
review process, and/or fixed their compensation structures.
But Wells pulling out was greeted with plenty of firms going
after its market share. (At $2-3 billion per month, divided
among 30-40 wholesalers, the volume is welcomed, and many of
those companies turn around and sell the loans to Wells anyway
through the correspondent channel. But if you're Wells, would
you rather deal with monitoring - and held liable by the DOJ -
one counterparty who sells you $100 million per month or
twenty counterparties selling you $5 million each?) Proponents
of the broker model believe that it is a cost effective way
for lenders to have their product seen by more potential
borrowers, and that those borrowers have more lender options
by using a broker (lender, price, lock period, and so on). It
is indeed an easy argument to say that the quality of the final
loan product is a result of the income, credit, appraisal,
borrower, and originator, rather than the channel through
which it funds.
It seems to be a secret that lenders' margins are higher than
they've ever been due indirectly, or directly, to the
increased compliance and regulatory burdens. Who in their
right mind would want to start a mortgage company when the
first group you'd hire is the compliance team rather than
loan officers? There is a lot of complaining about
governmental involvement in the financial & lending
system, which is justified. And certainly no regulator or
government official can complain about "too big to fail" or
"too much market share" when all of the hurdles they've put in
place have the "unintended consequence" of limiting
competition and bolstering margins at the expense of the
consumer. LO's who say, "Why hasn't a Realtor's commission
come under more scrutiny." First, it is transparent. But the
problem is that the mortgage community is over-regulated, not
that the Realtor community is under-regulated. Just because
Realtors have better lobbyists, don't begrudge them. This is
still a free country, if 5-6% commissions in a less regulated
business sound attractive, join ‘em. The barriers of entry
remain low for Realtors.
Last week the commentary repeated a note from a broker/banker
saying, “Loan officers across the board have set their margins
higher than pre-LO comp to ensure never making too
little.” I received this note: “This is happening, of
course, because current lender-favorable market conditions
allow such pricing latitude. When the inevitable return to
‘normalcy’ occurs and pricing again becomes more competitive,
LO’s will no longer be able to price at will. The industry is enjoying
an origination bull market which tends to distort behaviors,
but we should not fall into the trap of seeing this as the
new normal in mortgage banking.”
Dick L., and industry vet from San Francisco, wrote, "CFPB
director Richard Corday told Congress this past January that
he believes it is ‘probably not useful’ to try to define in
advance what an ‘abusive’ lending practice is. Instead, he
intends to use his enforcement powers to retroactively punish
lenders based on his view of the "facts and circumstances" of
each case. To me, this is Alice in Wonderland insane. The
attitude is ‘We are not
going to tell you what the rules are but once we decide what
they are we reserve the right to hold you retroactively
responsible.’The
CFPB has reviewed some large mortgage lenders and will soon
let them knew what unspecified rules they broke, if any. The
irony is that one of the authors of Dodd-Frank (Barney Frank)
defended the unsafe HUD mandated subprime lending practices of
FNMA and FHLMC…In the Wonderland that is Washington we had
government mandated subprime from FNMA, a defense of this when
questioned, an enormous hit to the economy when this explodes,
blame placed on the lenders who made the mandated subprime
loans and a new set of not-yet-ready-for-definition rules to
punish the miscreants for past violations of future rules. The
situation created by Dodd-Frank is close to worst case. The
regulating entities CFPB and the Financial Stability Oversight
Council have unchecked power. That dog don't hunt. To be
clear, I am by no means suggesting that government mandated
subprime was the only factor to cause the mortgage mess. It
was however the single most important factor in the
destruction of FNMA and FHLMC. The government did not mandate
the unsafe and unwise practices of entities such as Washington
Mutual. People have been asking, 'Why aren't lenders
lending?' A better question might be 'Why, faced with
possible penalties from an unchecked entity which can make
up tomorrow rules which applied yesterday, is anyone lending
at all?'"
HARP received another blow Friday, this time by Wells
Fargo's correspondent group. "Consistent with our
decision to only purchase FHA Streamline Refinances of Wells
Fargo serviced Loans, Wells Fargo Funding will begin
purchasing only DU Refi Plus refinances of Wells Fargo
serviced Loans...Wells Fargo will continue to purchase
DU Refi Plus refinances of Wells Fargo serviced Loans. This
policy change also applies to our retail origination channel.
Note: Loans serviced by America’s Servicing Company, a
subsidiary of Wells Fargo, are not considered Wells Fargo
serviced Loans." It takes effect on 9/24 for best efforts
locks, on for mandatory: "The policy change outlined above is
effective with Loans assigned to a Mandatory Commitment on and
after November 13, 2012. DU Refi Plus refinances of non-Wells
Fargo serviced Loans must be received and assigned to a
Mandatory Commitment by Wells Fargo on or before November 9,
2012, and must be purchased on or before November 30, 2012."
Here’s
a great opportunity to gain high value info about Realtor
relationships from the man who is #7 in the USA in homes
sold. On Wednesday Glenn Bill and his partners at Mortgage
Coach are hosting a free interactive webinar that will focus
on identifying, meeting and partnering with the top Realtors
in your marketplace, as well as maximizing your current
relationships. Sounds like a good way to spend a few minutes
and pick up skills that will last the rest of your career.
Click here to sign up: http://bit.ly/NYc9Rk.
In
a quick bit of M&A news, Hudson City Bancorp (135
branches) is being purchased by M&T Bank for $3.7
billion.
Well,
what do we have going this week besides LO's pushing and
shoving to try to have their refi's close on time? Zippo
today. Tomorrow we have another housing index (Case-Shiller
20-city index with its two month lag) and Consumer Confidence.
Wednesday is the second stab at Q2 GDP and another housing
index (Pending Home Sales). That afternoon is the Fed's Beige
Book. Thursday is Jobless Claims, Personal Income and
Consumption and the PCE Price Index. Friday is the Chicago
PMI, Michigan Consumer Sentiment, and Factory Orders. In
the early going the 10-yr yield, which closed Friday at
1.68%, is now at 1.67%, and MBS prices are nearly unchanged.
(Parental
discretion advised, although somewhat edited. And no, this is
unfortunately a myth.)
When Apollo Mission Astronaut Neil Armstrong first walked on
the moon, he not only gave his famous "one small step for man,
one giant leap for mankind" statement but followed it by
several remarks, usual com traffic between him, the other
astronauts and Mission Control. Just before he re-entered the
lander, however, he made the enigmatic remark "Good luck, Mr.
Gorsky." Many people at NASA thought it was a casual remark
concerning some rival Soviet Cosmonaut. However, upon
checking, there was no Gorsky in either the Russian or
American space programs. Over the years many people questioned
Armstrong as to what the "Good luck, Mr. Gorsky" statement
meant, but Armstrong always just smiled.
On July 5, 1995 (in Tampa Bay, FL) while answering questions
following a speech, a reporter brought up the 26-year-old
question to Armstrong. This time he finally responded. Mr.
Gorsky had finally died and so Neil Armstrong felt he could
answer the question.
When he was a kid, he was playing baseball with a friend in
the backyard. His friend hit a fly ball which landed in the
front of his neighbor's bedroom windows. His neighbors were
Mr. & Mrs. Gorsky.
As he leaned down to pick up the ball, young Armstrong heard
Mrs. Gorsky shouting at Mr. Gorsky, "Sex! You want sex?!
You'll get sex when the kid next door walks on the moon!"
If
you're interested, visit my twice-a-month blog at the STRATMOR
Group web site located at www.stratmorgroup.com.
The current blog discusses the new CFPB Rule combining TILA
& RESPA disclosures. If you have both the time and
inclination, make a comment on what I have written, or on
other comments so that folks can learn what's going on out
there from the other readers.