Jan. 2, 2013: Rates higher after government agreement - NAR weighs in; M&A and concentration in banking - could lenders share back office functions?
Rob Chrisman
Politicians
in Washington celebrated after kind of averting a completely unnecessary crisis
that was entirely of its own creation. One blog noted, "'This
deal proves that if we all procrastinate long and hard enough,
we can semi-solve any self-inflicted problem at the very last
minute in a way that satisfies no one,' said Senate Minority
Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky)...In a related story, an
arsonist received an award for putting out his own fire."
This
is sadly true – our elected officials seem to have kicked the
can down the road (as much as I am growing to dislike that
saying). Very little about the situation is resolved, and yet
rates have shot higher due to possibility of an expanding
economy and a small amount of uncertainty being removed from
the markets. By waiting until the last minute to scrape
together a limited bill (which extends the Bush-era tax rates
for most Americans and extends long-term unemployment
insurance, among other things), Congress sidelined some major
fiscal issues they initially sought to resolve before the new
year. Leaders in Washington deferred for two months the $1.2
trillion in across-the-board spending cuts (known as
"sequestration") set to hit the Pentagon and domestic programs
this week. Additionally, the bill passed this week failed
to raise the debt ceiling, even though the Treasury
technically hit the $16.4 trillion limit Monday – so we have
that to worry about now. Both of these issues will come to a
head just as Congress is expected to vote on a new federal
budget. The convergence of these issues practically guarantees
that within a matter of weeks, Washington will once again find
itself embroiled in another fiscal crisis.
(Speaking
of concentration, let’s not forget that Government Sponsored
Entities - pretty much Ginnie, Fannie, and Freddie - now
guarantee roughly 95% of the conforming mortgage market.)
Concentration
is not confined to the United States, of course. Recently
there was a story about how several stockbrokers in London are
in talks about merging back office operations, in a bid to cut
costs and avoid becoming takeover targets in a rapidly
consolidating sector. In London, at least, talks have been
prompted by increasingly difficult market conditions that have
led to a spate of job cuts and acquisitions among brokers. If
a deal to join back office functions is agreed, it would
demonstrate an unprecedented level of co-operation in the
fiercely competitive sector. There is no reason to think that
this won’t happen in mortgage banking once rates creep up and
volumes begin to slide. When business is scarcer, companies
will inevitably be more attentive to costs and save wherever
they can. Moving back to this chatter from London, a practical
plan to merge the back offices has not been drawn up but one
proposal was to pool resources for settlement and clearing,
which would potentially deliver greater cost savings for
the firms involved than if they individually outsourced those
functions. A big concern is how client confidentiality would
be protected, how regulations would be met, and how company
information would be kept confidential. November 1 saw the
introduction of EU short selling regulations had highlighted
the potential benefits of sharing costs. Imagine a world
where major lenders, or smaller lenders forged agreements,
and had one funding group, one pool of underwriters, one
compliance group, one “back office”.
The New York Times and many other sources reported that
banking regulators are close to a $10 billion settlement with
14 banks that would end the government’s efforts to hold
lenders responsible for foreclosure abuses like faulty
paperwork and excessive fees that may have led to evictions,
according to people with knowledge of the discussions. “Under
the settlement, a significant amount of the money, $3.75
billion, would go to people who have already lost their homes,
making it potentially more generous to former homeowners than
a broad-reaching pact in February between state attorneys
general and five large banks. That set aside $1.5 billion in
cash relief for Americans. Most of the relief in both
agreements is meant for people who are struggling to stay in
their homes and need the banks to reduce their payments or
lower the amount of principal they owe.”
And
those outside the industry wonder why companies are wary about
lending or servicing mortgages! Apparently a mandatory review
of millions of bank loans was not yielding meaningful examples
of the banks’ wrongfully evicting homeowners who were current
on their payments or making partial payments, according to the
people. But we’re still grappling with the $26 billion
settlement between the five largest mortgage servicers and the
state attorneys general, Justice Department and the Department
of Housing and Urban Development after allegations arose in
2010 that bank employees were churning daily through hundreds
of documents used in foreclosure proceedings without properly
reviewing them for accuracy. Supposedly under the terms of the
settlement being negotiated, $6 billion would come from banks
to be used for relief for homeowners, including reducing their
principal, helping them refinance and donating abandoned
homes. And the proposed settlement would also halt a separate
sweeping review of more than four million loan files that the
comptroller’s office and the Federal Reserve required the
banks undertake as part of a consent order in April 2011. Here
is the story: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/31/business/settlement-expected-with-banks-over-home-loans.html?hp&_r0&_r0.
The
M&A,
investor, and agency news rolls on.
Over in Louisiana Red River Bancshares ($1.1 billion in
assets) will buy Fidelity Bancorp ($126 million) for an
undisclosed sum. TF Financial ($701mm, PA) will buy Roebling
Financial ($162mm, NJ) for $14.5mm in cash and stock. TF is
the parent of 3rd Fed Bank. And Carlyle and other private
equity firms will buy financial
advisory and investment banking firm Duff & Phelps for
about $665 million.
Flagstar
is now offering additional options for subordinate financing
on Freddie Mac Relief Refinances. These include subordinate
financing that doesn’t fully amortize under a level monthly
payment plan for which either the maturity of balloon payment
date is under five years and subordinate financing that
restricts payment, such as subordinate liens with prepayment
penalties. Note that new subordinate financing isn’t eligible
for Relief Refinance loans.
Effective
immediately for all construction-to-permanent conventional
transactions, Flagstar is no longer requiring cash-out
refinance borrowers to have held legal title to the lot for
the six months preceding the date on which the permanent
mortgage was closed. The requirement to use the lesser of the
current appraised value or the lesser of the purchase price
plus improvements in order to calculate the LTV for FNMA
delayed financing has also been removed. For FHA and VA
properties, Flagstar no longer requires evidence that the
borrower has a history of managing rental properties when
departing the current residence, though they still need to
document 25% equity in the property and the lesser of two
months’ reserves for both properties or the reserve
requirement as dictated by the TOTAL Scorecard findings. For
conventional loans where the borrower is using rental income
to qualify, proof of a two-year landlord history will suffice
if the loan is submitted to LP.
Flagstar is no longer requiring appraisals for IRRRL
transactions that refinance Flagstar-serviced VA loans.
Appraisals are, however, still required for VA loans not
serviced by Flagstar that are refinanced by an IRRRL.
As of December 27th, Flagstar has suspended the Condo-Hotel
Program, which means that new registrations won’t be accepted
and that loans currently in the pipeline will be processed on
a case-by-case basis.
In training and events news, the FHA is hosting a webinar
on all things TOTAL Scorecard on January 16th. Setting
up to use the scorecard, reviewing files, downgrading files to
manual underwriting, and documentation are all on the agenda.
Register at http://www.visualwebcaster.com/FHA/90907/reg.html.
A 203(h) Home Mortgage Insurance for Disaster Victims and
203(k) Rehabilitation Mortgage Insurance webinar is being
offered by the FHA on January 17th. The first half,
which is devoted to the Disaster Victims Program, will discuss
the program eligibility requirements, maximum insurable
mortgages, closing costs, prepaid expenses, borrower cash
investment, mortgage terms, MIP payment, and refinancing. The
second half, which is aimed at loan officers, processors,
brokers, and agents alike, will give an overview of the
Rehabilitation Mortgage Insurance Program and cover the
relevant underwriting strategies. For more information and to
register, see http://www.visualwebcaster.com/event.asp?id'458.
On
to recent news: the housing industry received more good news
when we found out that pending home sales increased in
November for the third consecutive month and reached the
highest level in two-and-a-half years, according to the
National Association of Realtors (NAR). Remember that the data
reflect contracts but not closings, and LO’s often discuss the
problems they continue to have with cancellations. Lawrence
Yun, NAR’s chief economist, observed, "Home sales are
recovering now based solely on fundamental demand and
favorable affordability conditions.” On a year-over-year
basis, pending home sales have risen for 19 consecutive
months.
While
Congress did wind up approving a bill Tues, the “fiscal cliff”
has in effect been broke into two pieces, w/the “tax cliff”
getting resolved on New Year’s Day while a big “spending
cliff” looms on the horizon in the first quarter of 2013. And
analysts believe that the spending cliff will be a lot harder
to negotiate vs. the tax one. As tough as the tax debate wound
up being, the harder negotiations will happen in Q1 of 2013
when Republicans are likely to demand further spending cuts
(and entitlement changes) before countenancing a higher debt
ceiling.
For
scheduled news we’ll have Construction Spending, ISM
Manufacturing, and ISM Prices Paid – not big market movers. On
Monday the 10-yr closed at a yield of 1.75%, but in the early
going today we find the 10-yr up to 1.83% and MBS prices,
which will certainly make their way onto rate sheets, are
worse .250-.375.
Well, there was a bit of confusion at the grocery store this
morning.
When I was ready to pay for my groceries, the cashier said,
"Strip down, facing me."
I gave her a startled look and made a mental note to complain
to my Congressman about Homeland Security running amok,
however, I did just as she had instructed.
When the hysterical shrieking and alarms finally subsided, I
found out that she was referring to my credit card!!
Consequently, I have been asked to shop elsewhere in the
future.
They need to make their instructions a whole lot clearer for
us senior citizens!!
If
you're interested, visit my twice-a-month blog at the STRATMOR
Group web site located at www.stratmorgroup.com.
The current blog discusses the role of the IRS and REMIC’s in
the current credit crisis. If you have both the time and
inclination, make a comment on what I have written, or on
other comments so that folks can learn what's going on out
there from the other readers.